Great story Vicki.  Once again demonstrates the power of the words we use.

Regards, Tracy


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Vicki Chan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'ozmidwifery'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 2:53 AM
Subject: RE: Melbourne's Child article


> 
> Recently I was sitting at the desk at the private maternity unit where I
> am working a little (my shift was over and I was catching up with the
> dreaded paperwork...I cant keep up! 12 years since I worked in a
> hospital..."'waddayamean I have to think about more than one woman at a
> time???") when along comes one of the fathers... A midwife asks him
> 'how's things?' They had been experiencing very challenging
> breastfeeding problems... "Oh, great!" says the Dad..."No worries"
> Surprised, the midwife questioned further and the father replied they'd
> been fine since "She!" pointing at me had looked after them. "something
> she said changed everything!'
> 
> Everyone looked up, eager to know what this gem of wisdom I had shared
> was. Uh Oh thinks me. I had relayed a story of a woman I had spoked to a
> week or so before hand...
> 
> I was about to go home when a bell rang from one of the rooms... I did
> not know the woman but  noone else was available so I went in. The woman
> was in tears...'Can you help me? I cant get him on the breast
> properly..Is that where his top lip should be? I cant see his tongue. I
> don't know if his mouth is wide enough..should I sit up or lie
> down...??" I said to her gently "Where are you from" and she answered
> 'PNG'...I asked her is she remembered seeing the women in PNG feed their
> babies and she said 'Yes' I asked her if she could visualize and she
> said Yes...With her eyes closed she saw a large group of women sitting
> around all with babes at the breast. I asked her 'Are they looking at
> the babies?' "No" 'Are they concerned where the lip ofr the tongue or
> anything else for that matter is?' "No...they're just talking and
> laughing" I said...'Listen..just forget all that white man shit and let
> the baby do its thing' She replyed with 'Ooooh...the baby's on! He's
> feeding' mmmm
> 
> I tell you things at the desk stopped still for a moment as this father
> tells all... "Oh, she told us just to forget all that white man shit and
> get on and do what we please...we've been fine ever since'
> 
> Vicki
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Macha
> McDonald
> Sent: Sunday, June 02, 2002 6:28 AM
> To: ozmidwifery
> Subject: RE: Melbourne's Child article
> 
> 
> As a recent consumer, I can say that the (over) emphasis on technique
> and latch, although it is important, is very confusing.  When I had my
> daughter, in a baby friendly hospital, every midwife had a different
> idea about what I was meant to be doing.  Confusion is not the word.  My
> mind was in chaos!!! This baby friendly hospital recommended formula to
> me.  So much for the 10 steps!!!  Also, their LCs were very limited in
> their advice.  For low supply, I was told on more than 10 different
> occasions over 3 months to just keep expressing.  I agree with the baby
> friendly initiative, but seeing it 1st hand, I dont think its working.
> Some staff are just not committed enough.  Friends and family who are
> also recent consumers have sited that the MCHN and midwifes in hospital
> (rural VIC) told them their milk did not have enough nutrients in it,
> and that it wasnt strong enough.  I think the whole situation is worse
> than we think, and I am surprised that anyone is breastfeeding at all,
> considering the current climate....in my humble opinion!!! Regards,
> Macha.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Johnston
> Sent: Sunday, 2 June 2002 8:04 PM
> To: ozmidwifery
> Subject: RE: Melbourne's Child article
> 
> 
> Dear Liz
> While I agree wholeheartedly with most of the discussion on this, and I
> have seen the article in question, I feel I need to make a comment about
> your statement : < The 'baby friendly initiative' I believe, was aimed
> at developing countries whose children were dying of diarrhoeal disease
> through contaminated water, incorrect formula and lack of hygiene. >
> This is a not uncommon response, and it worries me greatly - I believe
> it's wrong.  I was involved in both the Victorian and the national BFHI
> set-up.  I am not actively involved in it now, but I support the
> underlying principles wholeheartedly.
> 
> I know of no reason why every maternity service in Australia should not
> implement the '10 steps to successful breastfeeding', and seek external
> assessment through the Baby Friendly Hospital accreditation process.
> This has very little to do with dirty water - babies die unnecessarily
> in Australia too because they are not breastfed.  The reasons for
> failure of breastfeeding (most are willing to initiate breastfeeding,
> but the drop-off rates are alarming) are many.  There is reliable
> evidence that practices which have for many years been common in
> maternity services across the developed world, such as separation of
> mother and baby, timing of feeds, use of artificial supplements, use of
> dummies and teats, advertising of alternatives to breastfeeding ... all
> contribute to early weaning.  These are the issues that are dealt with
> in the global Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative.  Sally's comments about
> babies who are brought into this world doped up to their eyeballs in
> narcotics are also relevant here. These babies and their mothers require
> special skilled support, and it can all be done within the baby friendly
> process. There's nothing daunting, or excessively focused on technique
> in the baby friendly initiative that I know about.  (I'm a realist - not
> everyone gets it right all the time, but that's life!)
> 
> Finally, we all agree that most mothers, most of the time, want what's
> best for their babies.  Midwives who seek to provide woman centred care
> will do all that they can to support the mother-baby bond, working with
> the natural process, and only interfering when we have a good reason.
> That's being mother-friendly too.
> 
> Protecting, promoting and supporting breastfeeding doesn't come easily.
> There are many deterrents in our society.  Our work should be
> underpinned by reliable evidence, and I would ask anyone who knows of
> evidence contrary to the BFHI '10 steps' to speak up now.
> 
> With my best wishes
> Joy Johnston
> 
> 
> 
> --
> This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
> Visit <http://www.acegraphics.com.au> to subscribe or unsubscribe.
> 
> --
> This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
> Visit <http://www.acegraphics.com.au> to subscribe or unsubscribe.
> 
> --
> This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
> Visit <http://www.acegraphics.com.au> to subscribe or unsubscribe.

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit <http://www.acegraphics.com.au> to subscribe or unsubscribe.

Reply via email to