Macha
What about contacting [EMAIL PROTECTED]
about a hospital that's supposed to be Baby Friendly
accredited.
Louise


--- Macha McDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As a recent consumer, I can say that the (over)
> emphasis on technique and
> latch, although it is important, is very confusing. 
> When I had my daughter,
> in a baby friendly hospital, every midwife had a
> different idea about what I
> was meant to be doing.  Confusion is not the word. 
> My mind was in chaos!!!
> This baby friendly hospital recommended formula to
> me.  So much for the 10
> steps!!!  Also, their LCs were very limited in their
> advice.  For low
> supply, I was told on more than 10 different
> occasions over 3 months to just
> keep expressing.  I agree with the baby friendly
> initiative, but seeing it
> 1st hand, I dont think its working.  Some staff are
> just not committed
> enough.  Friends and family who are also recent
> consumers have sited that
> the MCHN and midwifes in hospital (rural VIC) told
> them their milk did not
> have enough nutrients in it, and that it wasnt
> strong enough.  I think the
> whole situation is worse than we think, and I am
> surprised that anyone is
> breastfeeding at all, considering the current
> climate....in my humble
> opinion!!!
> Regards, Macha.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
> Behalf Of Johnston
> Sent: Sunday, 2 June 2002 8:04 PM
> To: ozmidwifery
> Subject: RE: Melbourne's Child article
> 
> 
> Dear Liz
> While I agree wholeheartedly with most of the
> discussion on this, and I
> have seen the article in question, I feel I need to
> make a comment about
> your statement :
> <
> The 'baby friendly initiative' I believe, was aimed
> at developing countries
> whose children were dying of diarrhoeal disease
> through contaminated water,
> incorrect formula and lack of hygiene. >
> This is a not uncommon response, and it worries me
> greatly - I believe it's
> wrong.  I was involved in both the Victorian and the
> national BFHI set-up.
>  I am not actively involved in it now, but I support
> the underlying
> principles wholeheartedly.
> 
> I know of no reason why every maternity service in
> Australia should not
> implement the '10 steps to successful
> breastfeeding', and seek external
> assessment through the Baby Friendly Hospital
> accreditation process.  This
> has very little to do with dirty water - babies die
> unnecessarily in
> Australia too because they are not breastfed.  The
> reasons for failure of
> breastfeeding (most are willing to initiate
> breastfeeding, but the drop-off
> rates are alarming) are many.  There is reliable
> evidence that practices
> which have for many years been common in maternity
> services across the
> developed world, such as separation of mother and
> baby, timing of feeds,
> use of artificial supplements, use of dummies and
> teats, advertising of
> alternatives to breastfeeding ... all contribute to
> early weaning.  These
> are the issues that are dealt with in the global
> Baby Friendly Hospital
> Initiative.  Sally's comments about babies who are
> brought into this world
> doped up to their eyeballs in narcotics are also
> relevant here. These
> babies and their mothers require special skilled
> support, and it can all be
> done within the baby friendly process. There's
> nothing daunting, or
> excessively focused on technique in the baby
> friendly initiative that I
> know about.  (I'm a realist - not everyone gets it
> right all the time, but
> that's life!)
> 
> Finally, we all agree that most mothers, most of the
> time, want what's best
> for their babies.  Midwives who seek to provide
> woman centred care will do
> all that they can to support the mother-baby bond,
> working with the natural
> process, and only interfering when we have a good
> reason.  That's being
> mother-friendly too.
> 
> Protecting, promoting and supporting breastfeeding
> doesn't come easily.
>  There are many deterrents in our society.  Our work
> should be underpinned
> by reliable evidence, and I would ask anyone who
> knows of evidence contrary
> to the BFHI '10 steps' to speak up now.
> 
> With my best wishes
> Joy Johnston
> 
> 
> 
> --
> This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
> Visit <http://www.acegraphics.com.au> to subscribe
> or unsubscribe.
> 
> --
> This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
> Visit <http://www.acegraphics.com.au> to subscribe
> or unsubscribe.


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit <http://www.acegraphics.com.au> to subscribe or unsubscribe.

Reply via email to