|
My understanding is that the current
recommendations are:
1. No co sleeping if either parent
smokes
2. No co sleeping if either parent takes
reacreational drugs or consumes large amounts of alcohol
3. No co sleeping on settees (couches)
The reason for the smoking is that the second hand
cigarette smoke puts the baby at risk of sids
The reason for the alcohol & drugs is the
impairment in levels of sleep and the inability of an inebriated or drunk adult
to recognise if they have rolled on a baby
The reason for the couches is that the studies show
babies that sleep with their parents on settees are more at risk of
sids.
There is no evidence that a baby in bed with its
parents who are not inebriated, smokers or heavy drinkers is at any more risk
that any other baby. In fact, there is some evidence that it reduces the risk of
sids. Studies that were carried out some time ago in an area of Wales UK found
that babies born in Asian families had significantly lower rates of sids than
caucasian babies in the same area. The hypothesis was that these babies co slept
in a family bed and this was thought to possibly confer some benefit. There is
some thought that it may be normal for a baby to stop breathing briefly and that
being beside an adult who is breathing may stimulate the baby to take another
breath, thus reducing the risk of sids.
There is also very clear evidence that
breastfeeding 100% offers benefits to babies against the risk of
SIDs.
I personally have known several women who have lost
a baby to SIDs through my work witha miscarriage, stillbirth and neonatal
death support group I worked with in the UK for some time. During the year I was
involved I knew 5 women who had lost a baby to SIDs and had the babies in cots
in another room. There was one woman whose baby coslept and died in her parents
bed while they were beside her. I remember the women who lost a baby that slept
in another room and then went on to have another baby all intended to co sleep
with their next baby since they felt their babies would be less at risk if they
were closer. Just anecdeotal but interesting.
I am interested that the fact that 2 babies died in
one area has resulted in advise not to co sleep. Were these two babies co
sleeping with parents who were not smokers, heavy drinkers or drug users? How
many babies died of SIDs in the same area that were not co sleeping? Did anyone
know the details of these two deaths or is this one of those stories passed on
from one person to the next without any real foundation?
This sounds like the policy at the hospitals here
that says the babies cannot be born in the birthing pool because a baby died in
a birthing pool in the UK. Never mind all the babies that died out of the
birthing pool. Or the actual reason for the death. Why are health professionals
often so keen to jump down on anything remotely "natural" or
"non-interventionist" yet happily embrace high risk activities that have not
been adequately tested and proved beneficial? And even will continue to use high
risk practices that have been proven to be high risk? Ridiculous.
Nikki Macfarlane
Singapore
----- Original Message -----
|
- Cosleeping Janelle & Lyndon Webb
- Re: Cosleeping S.J.F.ELECTRICAL.
- Re: terminology and midwifery Carol Thorogood
- Re: terminology and midwifer... Lynne Staff
- Re: terminology and midw... Carol Thorogood
- Re: Cosleeping Jayne
- Re: Cosleeping Phillip Fogarty
- Re: Cosleeping Nikki Macfarlane
- Re: Cosleeping Larissa & Tim Inns
- Re: Cosleeping barbara glare & chris bright
- FW: Cosleeping Tania & Simon
- Re: Cosleeping David
- Re: Cosleeping DebSlater
- re:cosleeping Grant and Louise
- Re: Cosleeping DebSlater
- Re: Cosleeping Sally Williams
- Re: Cosleeping Cheryl LHK
- Fw: Cosleeping elizabeth mcalpine
