My labour was short. I had PIH and was induced with gel. Contractions started at about 1.00pm, Julia was born at 4.57pm, her placenta at about 5.15ish. I didn't realise it was over so quickly, I felt like I was being swept along a swollen river. I just made sure I stayed afloat and tried to avoid the submerged rocks... :)  I personally have a belief that my body is a human cannon, not a cannonball :)  I did enjoy the whole experience though.  Maybe is was my friend, Nitrous Oxide that helped me enjoy it :)
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Judy Chapman
Sent: Sunday, 17 November 2002 10:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] Fw: [MCNSW] more interventions for labour!

I have been with so many women who have had short labours and the nearest way I can describe it, and mostly the women agree is: it is like a tornado has picked them up, blown them around and then unceremoniously dumped them with no concern for how they feel. Seems to me that women who have a labour much shorter than about 4-5 hours start to feel like that.

Judy

From: "Lynne Staff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] Fw: [MCNSW] more interventions for labour!
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 18:57:27 +1000
I remember two labours which stand out in particular - both primigravidas.
One given 2mg prostins at 36/40 for PIH - hard contractions began
immediately - one on top of the other (cervix on insertion posterior long
and closed). Dr went off not expecting anything to happen, and often when
women have PIH, they labour fast, as if they know that the babe (placenta)
needs to be born to keep them (all) safe. I took her to the birthing room
within 15 mins of prostins being inserted - into bath and within 2 hrs she
was feeling the babe move down and gave birth in the next 1/2 hr - remember
this was her first labour.
The other woman was term - IOL for large babe, but this woman is also tall -
gorgeous and statuesque. Same situation - 2 mg prostin, cx long, posterior,
firm and closed. 3 1/2 hrs later I literally 'caught' a 12 lb 3 oz baby boy,
as she stood up. Huge PPH afterwards. Not a wonderful beginning to
motherhood and life on the outside for this little (not-so-little) one.
These women did NOT want a short labour and rapid birth the next time!
Imagine what this medication offering shorter labour would have meant for
these women and their infants - I shudder to think! Totally awful labour and
birth - so fast that they literally did not know what was happening, or
perhaps an inverted uterus? Ruptured uterus?
Bizarre how these (new drugs) are seen as advances, and it never ceases to
amaze me at how persistent the efforts are to improve on something which is
already pretty amazing and works just fine (or else the world would not be
so populated, and we would have died out as a race long ago). What IS it
about labour and birth that scientists just have to keep on trying to change
it! Smacks of the Maleus Maleficarium (sorry, don't know the spelling, but
that book that the witchburners used to classify who were witches and why,
and then they meted out punishment to those they saw as interfering with
God's will), only the boots seem to be on different feet and the ones
hanging or burning just might be the women this time.....
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Robin Moon
Sent: Sunday, 17 November 2002 10:08 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Fw: [MCNSW] more interventions for labour!
it's about 3 hours I notice. They dont like it shorter than 3 hours.
somehow they feel robbed of the experience, like it was over before they had
a chance to really get into it.
----- Original Message -----
From: Lynne Staff
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2002 9:44 AM
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] Fw: [MCNSW] more interventions for labour!
I have seen many women who have experienced short labours (including
protin labours) who are completely overwhelmed both physically and
emotionally from the expereince, and I am not talking about the overwhelming
experience of birth either....they shake and are in a stse of shock. It is
often difficult for them to integrate what has happened and later, many of
them ask for a longer labour and gentler birth next time. It's like their
minds and bodies can't catch up with the other.
[Lynne Staff] -----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rhonda
Sent: Saturday, 16 November 2002 4:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Fw: [MCNSW] more interventions for labour!
"speeded up with prostaglandin gels or synthetic hormones"
Hmm- OR synthetic - which supports the pig semen theory. (sorry!)
And my concern in what about moulding? Doesn't a lot of
moulding happen as far as the mothers body, hips and pelvis etc.
I know a girl who had a really short labour but then went into
shock.
Rhonda
-------Original Message-------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Saturday, November 16, 2002 13:27:41
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ozmidwifery] Fw: [MCNSW] more interventions for
labour!
----- Original Message -----
From: Virginia Miltrup
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 8:08 AM
Subject: [MCNSW] more interventions for labour!
a proposed drug to reduce the time of first labour to 2-3 hours
by softening the collagen in the cervix! The scientists reckon it doesn't
hurt more, (but then again they might have been blokes :-)).
Website listed below.
Love Kate
PS What about all those women who were already going to have
quick births??
--------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.ivenus.com/family/news/LC-notebook1-wk40.asp
less labour?
If only childbirth weren't such hard work. it may soon get
easier, thanks to a new drug.
The move is on to shorten childbirth via a new drug that is due
to be tested later this year, according to a report in the New Scientist.
The theory is that a shorter labour should be less painful and
require less intervention on the part of doctors. The average time that most
first-time mums spend in labour is around 18 hours, and while this can be
speeded up with prostaglandin gels or synthetic hormones, these drugs can
make labour unbearably painful and may make women feel the urge to push
before the cervix is fully opened. This in itself can lead to complications.
The new drug, developed and patented by Britain's Medical
Research Council, may cut the average labour down to only two or three
hours. Most of the long, painful hours of labour are spent as the cervix
slowly opens from tightly closed to 10 centimetres.
Many women feel they have been in labour forever and rush into
the hospital expecting to deliver instantly only to be told they are just
two or three centimetres dilated! For most women (although there are those
who have quick births), dilation of the cervix is a slow process. The new
drug, however, is designed to speed up this process by softening the
collagen in the cervix. It is likely to be administered either through gel,
cream, microcapsules or injection, although as yet it is not known what form
it will take. So far it has only been tested on monkeys. In these cases, the
Scottish firm Ardana Bioscience, which has the licence for the new drug,
reports it worked very effectively.
By Marianne Hartigan
Maternity Coalition NSW
www.maternitycoalition.org.au
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
____________________________________________________
IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here


The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* -- This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics. Visit to subscribe or unsubscribe.

Reply via email to