Thanks Ann I thought that was the case but wasn't entirely sure about the conscientious objector form. Sandra ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ann green" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 8:11 PM Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Vaccination Incentive Payments
> Dear Sandra, > I don't know if this helps but here goes.Although I am > happy enough for my babies to have the full > immunisation program I was not happy with the idea of > the Hep.B at birth.I checked with my G.P and a paed. > as to whether the lack of injection at birth would > stop the baby from having full protection against Hep > B.Both stated that there was no medical evidence that > the Hep B at birth,except for Hep B mothers was > necessary.When my baies turned 18 months I was > entitled to that $250 + allowance.Ann --- "Sandra J. > Eales" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Wonder if anyone > can help me with a couple of > > questions or references where I might find out the > > answers? > > > > Do doctors miss out on their $18.50 incentive > > payment if the child doesn't have the Hep B birth > > Dose but completes the rests of the vaccination > > schedule? > > > > What about parent's incentive payment - do they > > still have to go through the whole conscientious > > objection deal - given that the child is still fully > > immunised and there is no "catch up" required? > > > > Sandra > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Everything you'll ever need on one web page > from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts > http://uk.my.yahoo.com > -- > This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics. > Visit <http://www.acegraphics.com.au> to subscribe or unsubscribe. -- This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics. Visit <http://www.acegraphics.com.au> to subscribe or unsubscribe.
