Hi all: I did find a couple of articles on the risk of repeat perineal trauma after 3rd and 4th degree tears: abstracts below...
 
marilyn
 

Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Jun;93(6):1021-4.

Related Articles, Links

Click here to read 
Risk of repetition of a severe perineal laceration.

Peleg D, Kennedy CM, Merrill D, Zlatnik FJ.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of
Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, USA.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcome of subsequent delivery in women with a history of a third- or fourth-degree laceration with outcomes in women without such a history. METHODS: This retrospective study used a perinatal database and chart review from 1978 to 1995. Only women whose first delivery was at our institution at more than 36 weeks' gestation, vaginal singleton, vertex presentation, and birth weight greater than 2500 g, with a subsequent delivery were included. The women were grouped by presence or absence of a third- or fourth-degree (severe) perineal laceration in their first delivery. The subsequent delivery was analyzed for maternal age, weight, birth weight, gestational age, method of delivery, use of episiotomy, and occurrence of a severe laceration. Comparison of data was by Fisher exact and t tests. RESULTS: Four thousand fifteen women met our starting criteria. In their first delivery, the average birth weight, use of instrumentation, and episiotomy rate were significantly higher in those women sustaining a severe laceration. When compared with women without a history of severe perineal laceration, women with such a history were at more than twice the risk for another in their subsequent delivery. The women at highest risk (21.4%) were those sustaining a laceration in their first delivery who underwent instrumental vaginal delivery with episiotomy in their subsequent delivery. When episiotomy or instrumental delivery was performed in the second vaginal birth, 52 (11.6%) of 449 women with a history of a severe perineal laceration sustained another, compared with 98 (6.5%) of 1509 without such a history (P < .001, odds ratio 1.9, 95% confidence interval 1.3, 2.7). CONCLUSION: Women delivering their second baby, and in whom episiotomy or instrumentation is used, are at increased risk of severe perineal laceration compared with women delivery spontaneously.

 

Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2000 Aug;40(3):244-8.

Related Articles, Links


Anal incontinence in women with third or fourth degree perineal tears and subsequent vaginal deliveries.

Sangalli MR, Floris L, Faltin D, Weil A.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University
Hospital of Geneva, Switzerland.

We contacted 208 women 13 years after they suffered an obstetrical anal sphincter tear in order to estimate the effect of subsequent vaginal deliveries on anal continence. Among the 177 eligible responders, 129 sustained a partial or complete 3rd degree and 48 a 4th degree tear; 114 women had subsequent vaginal deliveries. Anal incontinence was more common in women with 4th (25.0%) than with 3rd degree tears (11.5%, p = 0.049). Subsequent vaginal deliveries were associated with a higher prevalence of severe incontinence in women with 4th degree tears (p = 0.023). No aggravation or increase in prevalence of incontinence was observed in women with 3rd degree tears. These results suggest that in a subsequent pregnancy, careful evaluation is necessary and an abdominal delivery may be advisable for women with previous major sphincter trauma.

PMID: 11065029 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]


<<clip_image001.gif>>

Reply via email to