That family hitory head work is fascinating isnt it
i agree as with my woman a cs was the answer in the end
----- Original Message -----
From: "Marilyn Kleidon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 6:05 PM
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Brow presentations


> The mum was instinctively doing front to back rocking on the floor
mattress,
> throughout labour and while she was pushing. I debriefed with her and her
> partner today which was really good for all of us. What is interesting,
> Belinda, is that this woman also has a family history of c/s, 3 sisters
had
> all c/s and one a forceps with a not too good outcome which was why she
> opted for the c/s even before the ob agreed it was a brow and didn't think
> forceps/vacumm were an option. I am thinking there maybe something
physical
> midpelvis/at the spines which caused the baby to deflex, but who knows
maybe
> it was just the ARM in this particular situation??
>
> Interesting re the palp: I thought there was no head above the brim as did
> the PHO but ob thought she felt some face, but her hand was on the
opposite
> side to where the face was on delivery, on delivery the baby's hand popped
> out where ob thought the face was. Baby was not deep in the pelvis
> i.e.didn't need to be pushed out of the vagina to be delivered abdominally
> but the brow was definetly at the spines, no more though.
>
> I do think c/s was the only option for safe delivery of this baby.
>
> marilyn
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Lynne Staff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 7:38 PM
> Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Brow presentations
>
>
> > I tend to agree with Marilyn. Rupturing the membranes may have
contributed
> > to the babe coming down deep into the woman's pelvis in a deflexed
> position,
> > also making it more difficult for it to flex and rotate with no
> > 'cushioning'. An hour in the tub with some oblique pelvic stretches and
> > front to back rocking - don't ususally see this in labour, but it may
help
> > in times like this - may also have assisted with flexion and rotation.
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Marilyn Kleidon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 6:01 AM
> > Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Brow presentations
> >
> >
> > > Yes, Denise: I wonder if an hour in the tub would have helped?? There
> was
> > no
> > > synto augmentation involved 4cm to fully in 4 hrs seemed like a lovely
> > > active birth was about to happen. Yes also: those Midwifery Today
> > > suggestions are great to try in a homebirth situation/independent
> practice
> > > but please tell me if there are any of you out there who would push a
> baby
> > > gently out of the pelvis and try to rotate and flex the head in a
> hospital
> > > birth suite? Also once I called in the consultant it became her call,
> > > however to be honest I kind of felt if I had said I was prepared to
try
> to
> > > use my fingers to deflex the head she just might have let me(in the OT
> of
> > > course). I must admit I am a tad intimidated in the hospital but also
I
> > have
> > > never encountered a brow presentation before: it has all been
academic.
> > So,
> > > I await your wise counsel.
> > >
> > > marilyn
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Denise Hynd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 6:13 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Brow presentations
> > >
> > >
> > > > Dear Marilyn
> > > > Thank you for sharing your reflections and cogitations.
> > > >
> > > > This is my beleif, experience that midwives do reflect on all that
> > inputs
> > > > into a labour and the possible interplay rather than jumpimg to
blame,
> > > > denouncement  of specific action of another or the woman and baby
like
> > an
> > > > edict of an all knowing being !!
> > > >
> > > > In this particular insistance or similar I also wonder about the
> ramming
> > > (?)
> > > > effect of ARM and maybe other things that may have startled the
mother
> > or
> > > > baby in the hospital??
> > > >
> > > > I take it there was no synto also pushing the hole along?
> > > > .
> > > > I understand and have seen floating in tubs to  help unstick some
> > > asynclitic
> > > > babies I wonder if it would help relax a non rigid brow back to a
face
> > or
> > > > vertex??
> > > >
> > > > Also Midwifery Today & other midwifery texts talk of pushing stuck
> > babies
> > > > back and other maneovers trying to unstick them but that would be
> easier
> > > > with intact membranes?
> > > >
> > > > Denise
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Marilyn Kleidon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 11:37 PM
> > > > Subject: [ozmidwifery] Brow presentations
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > What do you all know about brow presentations? I was with a lovely
> > woman
> > > > > yesterday who wanted a natural birth and so i spent the morning
with
> > her
> > > > and
> > > > > her partner on the floor, in the shower and she dilated to fully
> > within
> > > 4
> > > > > hrs, just lovely and I am sure (so sure) I palped a posterior
> > fontanelle
> > > > > such that baby was direct OA, but almost military poition; I was
> > trying
> > > so
> > > > > hard to follow her through a physiological 2nd stage but after an
> hour
> > > and
> > > > a
> > > > > half with no sign of baby's head I did another VE and she had
pushed
> > > down
> > > > a
> > > > > small anterior lip, which obligingly slipped back but now there
was
> a
> > > > > central anterior fontanelle with caput just inferior to the
> > fontanelle,
> > > so
> > > > > consultant called in and an emergency c/s due to brow
> presentation(not
> > > > > emergent emergent, baby was just fine and mum was exhausted but
not
> > > > > physiologically compromised). Baby had great apgars, which is good
> as
> > I
> > > > had
> > > > > not identified any fetal distress, I just want to know if there is
> > > > anything
> > > > > we could have done differently. Mum spent most of her labour and
2nd
> > > stage
> > > > > on all fours on the floor over a bean bag, with regular partner
> > dancing,
> > > > > pelvic rocking ie very active and effective first stage after 4cm.
> She
> > > had
> > > > > had a prolonged early first stage with  a significant hind leak
and
> > > > > intermittent contractions for almost 24 hrs before presenting to
to
> > > birth
> > > > > suite yesterday for IOL and antibiotics. She was then 4cm dilated
> and
> > > ARM
> > > > of
> > > > > forwaters to induce baby ROL at this time (this happened before my
> > shift
> > > > > thankfully as I have a hard time supporting ARM and just hate that
> > > > > compromised feeling). Anyway she moved rapidly into an effective
> > active
> > > > > first stage as described above.
> > > > >
> > > > > I am wondering if anyone thinks preserving those forewaters might
> had
> > > > > avoided the malpresentation. Also should I have re-examined her
> > earlier?
> > > > Do
> > > > > you think I mistook the posterior fontanelle for the anterior one
on
> > my
> > > > > first 2nd stage VE? I was so convinced, I mean it felt like a text
> > book
> > > > > palp.I just hate to think I encouraged this woman to work so hard
> for
> > > one
> > > > > and half hours when I could have saved her that exhaustion. And I
> > don't
> > > > mean
> > > > > "saved" in any metaphysical sense, just can't think of a better
> word.
> > I
> > > > know
> > > > > hindsight is often 20/20 and am not beating myself up, just trying
> to
> > > > > understand. There was some veiled criticism from the ob regarding
> not
> > > > having
> > > > > "effective analgesia" on board: however it was realised when the
> woman
> > > > > elected to have a GA that having an epidural or narcotics was
never
> > part
> > > > of
> > > > > her plan.
> > > > >
> > > > > I have looked up all of my texts and am pretty satisfied that a
c/s
> > for
> > > > > brow presentation is the best alternative, but would welcome other
> > > ideas.
> > > > >
> > > > > thanks
> > > > > marilyn
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
> > > > > Visit <http://www.acegraphics.com.au> to subscribe or unsubscribe.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
> > > > Visit <http://www.acegraphics.com.au> to subscribe or unsubscribe.
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
> > > Visit <http://www.acegraphics.com.au> to subscribe or unsubscribe.
> >
> > --
> > This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
> > Visit <http://www.acegraphics.com.au> to subscribe or unsubscribe.
> >
>
>
> --
> This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
> Visit <http://www.acegraphics.com.au> to subscribe or unsubscribe.

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit <http://www.acegraphics.com.au> to subscribe or unsubscribe.

Reply via email to