|
Hi
Juliana,
I know this is a bit of a late reply but I would love to read your "Masters" paper, this is a topic especially interesting for me, or at least have the list of references. I am in Brisbane, where are you? Are you getting your paper published in the ACMA journal? Cheers, Joanne. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Juliana Brennan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, August 03, 2003 9:27 PM Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] Any ideas for research and mosiac? > Dear Jo, > Post dates pregnancy is one of the most common reasons cited for inducing > labour. When I did my Masters last year I looked into the care of women > with post dates pregnancy. I looked at Induction of labour as one approach > and conservative care as the other. I didn't do any research as such, it > was more a critical literature review and I then wrote a policy for the care > of women with post dates pregnancy from a woman's choice perspective. ie a > conservative approach vs induction of labour. > > I mainly concentrated on the risks and benefits of induction of labour vs an > alternative approach to post dates pregnancy, cost of both approaches, > perinatal mortality and morbidity associated with either approach, fetal > surveillance methods used for conservative approaches and their > effectiveness, accurate pregnancy dating, and the use of alternative > practices to induce or augment labour. > > Good luck with your studies. > Juliana |
- Re: [ozmidwifery] A late request Mrs Joanne M Fisher
- Re: [ozmidwifery] A late request Mary Murphy
