|
This is also of enormous interest to women having homebirths. I would
be grateful if I too could read it. How does one obtain a copy?
thaks, MM
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 10:22
AM
Subject: [ozmidwifery] A late
request
Hi
Juliana,
I know this is a bit of a late reply but I would love to read
your "Masters"
paper, this is a topic especially interesting for me, or at
least have the
list of references. I am in Brisbane, where are
you? Are you getting your
paper published in the ACMA
journal?
Cheers, Joanne.
----- Original Message -----
From:
"Juliana Brennan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, August 03, 2003 9:27 PM
Subject: RE:
[ozmidwifery] Any ideas for research and mosiac?
> Dear
Jo,
> Post dates pregnancy is one of the most common reasons cited for
inducing
> labour. When I did my Masters last year I looked into
the care of women
> with post dates pregnancy. I looked at
Induction of labour as one
approach
> and conservative care as the
other. I didn't do any research as such, it
> was more a critical
literature review and I then wrote a policy for the
care
> of women
with post dates pregnancy from a woman's choice perspective.
ie
a
> conservative approach vs induction of labour.
>
>
I mainly concentrated on the risks and benefits of induction of labour
vs
an
> alternative approach to post dates pregnancy, cost of
both approaches,
> perinatal mortality and morbidity associated with
either approach, fetal
> surveillance methods used for conservative
approaches and their
> effectiveness, accurate pregnancy dating, and the
use of alternative
> practices to induce or augment
labour.
>
> Good luck with your studies.
>
Juliana
|
