Re: [ozmidwifery] flash photography during birth

[Marilyn Kleidon]

Yes and California too: I was a bit stunned. Amazingly enough a lot of our young parents were (at the time ) dot commers and so they were quite techy, photos appearing on the internet as the birth was happening (not all but some, ok) hence the need for a doula when dad is so occuppied.... It is possible that their flashes were aimed away from the baby's eyes. I am in the same place as mary and wouldn't fahs my baby but...   marilyn ----- Original Message ----- From: Jen Semple To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 23, 2004 6:04 PM Subject: [ozmidwifery] flash photography during birth Marilyn, was this true amongst homebirthers in Seattle too?  That's really interesting.   Jen Marilyn Kleidon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I guess anecdotal evidence will not suffice for this gentleman, umh! If photographic eveidence is required then you could have  high speed film, slow shutter speed and while you prolly wont get a great photo, you may have some evidence in the future. I had my camera set up like this for the birth of my third daughter and did get a lot lovely though grainy photos with no flash. This was 23 yrs ago and now nobody(that I have been around) seems concerned about the flash I am interested that this is still a concern. Have we just forgotten about it?   marilyn Find local movie times and trailers on Yahoo! Movies.