|
Thanks for this, and for the feedback so far - I'm
sure more is on the way!
The situation is that I am contesting another
practitioner's management of a delivery. One aspect of this delivery was that he
commenced CCT on a friable cord (small baby- IUGR - scrappy cord) almost as soon
as the oxytocic had been given (we use sytocinon not syntormetrine by the way
Mary). The cord, not surprisingly, separated. And a chain of events
ensued.... :-(
I challenged the fact that CCT had been commenced
before signs of separation, and was told that the only factor needed to be
ascertained was that the uterus was contracted.
I know that I was taught to await signs of
separation before commencing CCT, even given that in those days we always
used syntometrine,so this surprised me.
As this situation is now being taken further (there
is obviously a lot more to the whole story) I need to have my facts and
evidence to back up my opinion before the next stage. Unfortunately it
still seems to be that this issue is unclear with most centres recommending
waiting, and some recommending immediate CCT with the first uterine
contraction. 'Active management' is a term used frequently with, it seems,
an assumption that people know what it entails. I would be very interested
to hear from student midwives on this - what exactly are you being taught
nowadays?
The second point of contention in this issue is
what defines a retained placenta - I would have thought this was patently clear
with most authorities agreeing that a period of 60 minutes is acceptable in the
absence of bleeding. As you will have guessed by now - this time was not
given!
Just for clarification, the patient had an
empty bladder, an IVI with syntocinon infusion and was not
bleeding.
Thanks again all
Sue
|
- Re: [ozmidwifery] question Susan Cudlipp
- Re: [ozmidwifery] question JoFromOz
- Re: [ozmidwifery] question Kim Stead
- Re: [ozmidwifery] question Susan Cudlipp
- Re: [ozmidwifery] question JoFromOz
- RE: [ozmidwifery] question Jeannie Minnis
- RE: [ozmidwifery] question Dean & Jo
- Re: [ozmidwifery] question Callum & Kirsten
- RE: [ozmidwifery] question Dean & Jo
- [ozmidwifery] Red heads Denise Fisher
- Re: [ozmidwifery] Red heads Kim Stead
