One of the women in my forums posted this comment which I
think is very interesting, while I know there are far too many c/s as is, I
think she has a valid point. What do you think? “I was just thinking that the
name 'elective C/S' should be changed to 'scheduled C/S'. So many people don't
elect caesareans but have them as a matter of medical necessity and the term
elective implies a choice that may not exist and IMO probably contributes to
the whole 'too posh to push' perception that alot of people have of scheduled
C/S's.......” I know that lots of these scheduled
caesarians are probably unnecessary, but of course some aren’t. Best
Regards, |
- [ozmidwifery] Scheduled Caesareans...? Kelly @ BellyBelly
- Re: [ozmidwifery] Scheduled Caesareans...? Janet Fraser
- Re: [ozmidwifery] Scheduled Caesareans...? Judy Chapman