Sally this is a public list with archives publicly available on the internet. 
Anyone googling for Epi-no may have stumbled across emails from this list and 
sent them on. Quite possibly it is somebody's job to google for discussions 
just like this one on a daily or weekly basis so the company can defend 
themselves if they want to. There is no privacy on the internet and it is a 
mistake to think that there is, especially in a public forum or mailing list.

At 5:21 PM +1100 12/1/06, Sally-Anne Brown wrote:
>Dear all,
>
>RE:  Dear Kelly,
>>I have just been sent the email you sent from your client regarding EPI-NO.
>>I have also seen the  comment from a midwife who answered your query.
>
>I am very interested to read these posts.
>Sent by whom ???
>It is clear that irrespective of comments made on this list that any person 
>forwarding list emails without consent of the persons involved is (knowlingly 
>or unknowingly) in breach of basic email ethics.
>In the extreme of course this may be referred to as a 'mole'.
>Can those persons who wish to send on emails please take the time to ask first 
>?
>and for the person/persons who have sent on these emails, perhaps you will 
>consider acknowledging this to the list.
>
>Kind Regards
>
>Sally-Anne
>
>
>----- Original Message ----- From: "Andrea Robertson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[email protected]>
>Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 4:17 PM
>Subject: [ozmidwifery] EPI-NO
>
>>Hello,
>>
>>Just forwarding a message I received from Tecsana, that was intended for the 
>>list....
>>
>>------------
>>>You have not provided sufficient information for a response to this
>>woman's query however
>>from what has been provided:
>>
>>a. The second time she has used EPI-NO
>>b. She was pushing out the balloon.
>>
>>the woman was not following instructions in the correct use of EPI-NO. It 
>>would not be
>>possible to push out the balloon with the amount of dilatation possible after 
>>the second
>>use. The balloon is inflated to the level of personal comfort and the woman 
>>will experience
>>a slight burning sensation at which point she would cease dilatation. This is 
>>controlled by
>>the woman. Your client should not recommence training with EPI-NO unless 
>>instructed to
>>by her obstetrician as her problem may be the result of an underlying 
>>condition.
>>
>>Perhaps you could request from the midwife who made that comment, clinical 
>>evidence
>>to support it.  We work in an evidence based medical  environment, and all 
>>evidence of
>>which we are aware supports the contrary view. A new EPI-NO  Clinical Trial 
>>will commence
>>in January through Sydney University to show the effect of EPI-NO on the 
>>Pelvic Floor
>>following childbirth.
>>
>>Please make you client aware that EPI-NO is also a pelvic floor training 
>>device which can
>>be used 4-6 weeks after delivery to strengthen the Pelvic Floor.
>>
>>I would be happy to  answer any questions you may have.
>>
>>Sincerely
>>
>>Campbell Heather
>>Tecsana Limited.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>-----
>>Andrea Robertson
>>Birth International * ACE Graphics * Associates in Childbirth Education
>>
>>e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>web: www.birthinternational.com
>>
>>
>>--
>>This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
>>Visit <http://www.acegraphics.com.au> to subscribe or unsubscribe.
>>
>>
>>--
>>No virus found in this incoming message.
>>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.17/227 - Release Date: 11/01/2006
>>
>
>
>
>--
>No virus found in this outgoing message.
>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.17/227 - Release Date: 11/01/2006
>
>--
>This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
>Visit <http://www.acegraphics.com.au> to subscribe or unsubscribe.


-- 
Jo Bourne
Virtual Artists Pty Ltd
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit <http://www.acegraphics.com.au> to subscribe or unsubscribe.

Reply via email to