----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 8:46
PM
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] VBAC after
dehsicence or UR?
I
would have to look for the research (we all know how 'fair' research can be!)
but the stated contra-indicators for vbac is previous rupture. Now it
doesn't actually state if the chances of another rupture are higher than a
normal scar or whether it is a case of "dam! Not going to let
that happen again!" attitude. You could argue I suppose that even a
dehiscence that required repair would be considered the same as a repeat
cs....?? Perhaps no vbac after one rupture/dehiscence would be based on
fear and/or presumption. Similar to the situation where a woman loses a
baby during labour there is the assumption that she will want a cs next
time.???
jo
Hi all,
does anyone know of
research on VB after UR? I was asked this:
So if you've had a scar come apart to
the point where the baby was on its way out via the DIY sunroof, and the ob
says he would have had to cut me open to stitch it up even if I had pushed
the baby out, would that make VBA2C too risky?
Thanks in
advance,
J
Attending births is like
growing roses. You have to marvel at the ones that just open up and bloom at
the first kiss of the sun but you wouldn't dream of pulling open the petals
of the tightly closed buds and forcing them to blossom to your time line.
~Gloria
Lemay~
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by
AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.21/236 -
Release Date: 1/20/2006
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by
AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.21/236 -
Release Date: 1/20/2006
