Keep on truckin' Di, I know its really hard copping the heat when what you are actually doing is doing your job really well...there's lots of us chipping away out here, all over the country (world), its good to remember by hearing the comments on the list that were are not alone with our "radical" thoughts. Trying to marginalise ideas which are really strong and important is another ploy to silence us. Viva la hysteria! 
 
Love suzi
----- Original Message -----
From: diane
Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2006 2:56 PM
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Fw: E-News 8:11 - Postdates Pregnancies (May 24, 2006)

 but the women are free to say what they want and demand complete informed consent, and we can help them navigate that rocky terrain.
 
 
Absolutely, the point I tried to make at our meeting at work last week, but the powers to be and some colleagues, think that women who don't ask or demand info, should only be given the standard spiel to gain 'informed' consent, eg for Vit K. I try to expand on anything and enlighten them to the whole spectrum of choice. I consider myself to be advocate for all women within my care even if it is only one antenatal visit or a phone enquiry. When being advocate for those who do demand, who almost always are well informed, the establishment seem to think that is OK, but talk about the same stuff to all women, especially those who are basically un -knowledgeable about anything related to their bodies and babies, then I am just being radical. I feel these are the women who benefit from  our advocacy the most. Its a frustrating situation, to be criticised for empowering women to make these decisions about themselves. I find it less rewarding advocating for those who are already empowered to express their wishes.
 
Di
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 3:55 PM
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Fw: E-News 8:11 - Postdates Pregnancies (May 24, 2006)

I love that you use the word mysogony Justine, and hi and thankyou to you Penny too.
 
I was talking to a fellow midwife at my hosp about it the other day. Sometimes we wanted to give the benefit of the doubt...at worst that the actions of some Drs was paternalistic -  wanting to help the poor ladies from their suffering (while of course making life litigiously safer for themselves and getting paid more). 
 
Then i also considered it was just ignorance on the part of some doctors, unware of the amazing beuaty and awesome transedence of anything worldly in natural birth and the power that this gives women. They rarely get to see beautiful birth (which is why i love working with student doctors  in birth and getting in their ears). Maybe they don't understand how good it can be for women, is it too spiritual, too unscientific for them to get their head around?
 
But I am more and more convinced that there is some phsycological women hate going on as well. And wanting to claim birth into the male relm.  Taking away this amazing opportunity for empowerment. BIRTH ENVY?    Or thinking that most women are too weak to be able to birth without intervention. Or too stupid to understand the details so he'll make the desicion for them. Or too smarty pants and asking too many questions and taking up too much time so needs to be put into place with some condeseding remark - if that doesnt stop her she's too dangerous and needs to be told to go elsewhere.
 
We spoke about a doctor with a very high c/section rate. If according to him you are too short, too old , too Asian  etc- you are convinced through the course of antenatal "care" that you can't possibly vaginally birth and an "elective" ("elective" for whom?) c/s is booked on a day suitable to him. By the time we are meeting the women - for shave and catheter they are absolutly convinced they are doing the right thing. Which puts us in a really difficult possition. 1/2 an hour before surgery is not a great time to talk to women about their alternative options. One woman - a 40 yr old Philipino primip was told her baby was breech and needed to have a c/s - but it wasn't breech, and the Dr knew it. But she was so sold on the idea that she couldnt birth vaginally that she didnt really mind about where the baby was lying. THIS WAS NOT HIS CHOICE TO MAKE.
 
We need to keep working on UNIVERSAL (mainstream, free, accessable) opportunities for women to find information and care and reduce the fear. In that town right now the alternative voices women get to hear are only soft squeeks amongst the bellow of the monolith.
 
Maybe we are scared sometimes to speak up in our workplace if we want to keep our job and dont want to rock the boat, but the women are free to say what they want and demand complete informed consent, and we can help them navigate that rocky terrain. And isn't it great when you get to work with a women who is making those demands, and get to advocate for them - its very safe territory because we are doing what our midwifery competancies demand. 
 
Love Suzi
 
 
 

Reply via email to