Hi Melanie, I suppose it is all about comparing the risks associated with having antibiotics with the risk of the baby being affected by GBS. The antibiotics are unlikely to do harm, except perhaps by damaging the woman's normal flora for a time. The consequences of things going wrong with the baby should it contract GBS are devastating. The chance of complications of either is small but the complications of GBS are so devastating as to warrant giving the antibiotics, I believe. Not all intervention is bad. All the best, Nicole.
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Melanie Sommeling Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 10:15 PM To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au Subject: [ozmidwifery] Alternative GBS Hi wise women of the list, I am curious if anyone can enlighten me of any alternatives to Antibiotics in labour to decrease GBS transfer from mother to baby. I recollect some info about douching during labour, but the info was sketchy to say the least. I understand the risks of transfer are low and the risk or negative effects are even lower, but alternatively have witnessed a birth of a GBS positive mother where AB's were administered and the baby still developed respiratory distress with several hours of birth and question the validity of using AB'a at all. Any advice on the matter would be greatly appriciated. Melanie -- This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics. Visit <http://www.acegraphics.com.au> to subscribe or unsubscribe. -- This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics. Visit <http://www.acegraphics.com.au> to subscribe or unsubscribe.
