Of 2007? HA, i kill me!
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Michael Nemtsev <[email protected]> wrote: > Btw, BETA2 should be released November 18th > > > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf > Of Nigel Hertz > Sent: Wednesday, 28 October 2009 11:09 AM > > To: ozMOSS > Subject: RE: SharePoint Site Directory > > > > I’m desperately hoping to obtain a beta copy of SPS 2010 soon. I want to > start planning how to convince the powers-that-be that we NEED it :p > > > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf > Of Paul Noone > Sent: Wednesday, 28 October 2009 10:10 AM > To: ozMOSS > Subject: RE: SharePoint Site Directory > > > > Just as a follow up, I’m trying to achieve a per site collection replacement > using the Table Of Contents web part but the filtering leaves a bit to be > desired. Is there any easy way to hack this to show ONLY sites and subsites? > > > > None of the filter web parts let me define a contentclass value. > > > > I don’t want to use CQWP (which is always restircited to a list type anyway) > because I like the current hierachy and column display options. > > > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf > Of Paul Noone > Sent: Wednesday, 28 October 2009 8:37 AM > To: ozMOSS > Subject: RE: SharePoint Site Directory > > > > That’s just about the best news I’ve heard all week. J > > > > Will they be replacing it with a cross site lookup that can query ALL site > collections and sites from a master list, and present them in the expected > tree view? > > > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf > Of Michael Nemtsev > Sent: Tuesday, 27 October 2009 9:51 PM > To: 'ozMOSS' > Subject: RE: SharePoint Site Directory > > > > Just delete Site Directory J > > SharePoint 2010 doesn’t support it any longer > http://tinyurl.com/sp2010uichanges > > > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf > Of Paul Noone > Sent: Tuesday, 27 October 2009 2:39 PM > To: ozMOSS > Subject: SharePoint Site Directory > > > > After dozens of user complaints about how lame this template is I’m now in a > position where I’m being forced to either get it to list ALL sites > (collections) or delete it. > > > > I’m sure all of you have encountered the following when trying to apply a > site directory URL that is outside the current site collection. > > > > “The location entered is not a site collection relative path, or the > specified Site Directory does not exist in the current Site Collection.” > > > > But what good is a Site Directory if it’s limited to one collection?! And > given this limitation, why bother having a Master Site Directory setting in > Central Administration!? > > > > I briefly considered creating a new site directory for each site collection > but quickly scrapped that idea when I realised it’d be even more confusing > to end users. > > > > I then looked at cross-site lookups, scope result page, and even a custom > sitemap provider. But all of these would mean a loss of functionality > (categorisation, listing settings per site etc). So now I’m back to simply > deleting it. Which kinda sucks. > > > > I’d be very interested to hear what others have done in this area. > > > > Regards, > > Paul > > Online Developer, ICT > CEO Sydney > > > > ________________________________ > > Stockland Notice: If this communication has been sent to you by mistake, > please delete and notify us. If it has been sent to you by mistake, legal > privilege is not waived or lost and you are not entitled to use it in any > way. Stockland and its subsidiaries reserve the right to monitor e-mail > communication through its networks. > > _______________________________________________ > ozmoss mailing list > [email protected] > http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss > > _______________________________________________ ozmoss mailing list [email protected] http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
