Whoops, nevermind :P I didn’t see the "HA, i kill me!" :P -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Daniel W. Brown Sent: Wednesday, 28 October 2009 12:41 PM To: ozMOSS Subject: RE: SharePoint Site Directory
Of SharePoint 2010 -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bill Williamson Sent: Wednesday, 28 October 2009 12:37 PM To: ozMOSS Subject: Re: SharePoint Site Directory Of 2007? HA, i kill me! On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Michael Nemtsev <[email protected]> wrote: > Btw, BETA2 should be released November 18th > > > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Nigel Hertz > Sent: Wednesday, 28 October 2009 11:09 AM > > To: ozMOSS > Subject: RE: SharePoint Site Directory > > > > I’m desperately hoping to obtain a beta copy of SPS 2010 soon. I want > to start planning how to convince the powers-that-be that we NEED it > :p > > > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Paul Noone > Sent: Wednesday, 28 October 2009 10:10 AM > To: ozMOSS > Subject: RE: SharePoint Site Directory > > > > Just as a follow up, I’m trying to achieve a per site collection > replacement using the Table Of Contents web part but the filtering > leaves a bit to be desired. Is there any easy way to hack this to show ONLY > sites and subsites? > > > > None of the filter web parts let me define a contentclass value. > > > > I don’t want to use CQWP (which is always restircited to a list type > anyway) because I like the current hierachy and column display options. > > > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Paul Noone > Sent: Wednesday, 28 October 2009 8:37 AM > To: ozMOSS > Subject: RE: SharePoint Site Directory > > > > That’s just about the best news I’ve heard all week. J > > > > Will they be replacing it with a cross site lookup that can query ALL > site collections and sites from a master list, and present them in the > expected tree view? > > > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Michael Nemtsev > Sent: Tuesday, 27 October 2009 9:51 PM > To: 'ozMOSS' > Subject: RE: SharePoint Site Directory > > > > Just delete Site Directory J > > SharePoint 2010 doesn’t support it any longer > http://tinyurl.com/sp2010uichanges > > > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Paul Noone > Sent: Tuesday, 27 October 2009 2:39 PM > To: ozMOSS > Subject: SharePoint Site Directory > > > > After dozens of user complaints about how lame this template is I’m > now in a position where I’m being forced to either get it to list ALL > sites > (collections) or delete it. > > > > I’m sure all of you have encountered the following when trying to > apply a site directory URL that is outside the current site collection. > > > > “The location entered is not a site collection relative path, or the > specified Site Directory does not exist in the current Site Collection.” > > > > But what good is a Site Directory if it’s limited to one collection?! > And given this limitation, why bother having a Master Site Directory > setting in Central Administration!? > > > > I briefly considered creating a new site directory for each site > collection but quickly scrapped that idea when I realised it’d be even > more confusing to end users. > > > > I then looked at cross-site lookups, scope result page, and even a > custom sitemap provider. But all of these would mean a loss of > functionality (categorisation, listing settings per site etc). So now > I’m back to simply deleting it. Which kinda sucks. > > > > I’d be very interested to hear what others have done in this area. > > > > Regards, > > Paul > > Online Developer, ICT > CEO Sydney > > > > ________________________________ > > Stockland Notice: If this communication has been sent to you by > mistake, please delete and notify us. If it has been sent to you by > mistake, legal privilege is not waived or lost and you are not > entitled to use it in any way. Stockland and its subsidiaries reserve > the right to monitor e-mail communication through its networks. > > _______________________________________________ > ozmoss mailing list > [email protected] > http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss > > _______________________________________________ ozmoss mailing list [email protected] http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss _______________________________________________ ozmoss mailing list [email protected] http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss _______________________________________________ ozmoss mailing list [email protected] http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
