Hi Anna -
I know that it looks that way, the abstract then "bio" coming first but that's
the way they asked me to format it for the journal submission. The rest of the
paper, some 10-12 pages of it are there at least in the pdf I just checked that
I sent out to all, and it ends with pictures -- yes -- that I'd rather were
deleted but also asked for in the submission. I just attached this longer
"padded" pdf, I apologize, but the paper is there after the first page.
Hope that helps.
Michel, it seems to me that your argument, while just so understandable and
reasonable on some level, is still the same old "we have to be realistic and
patient" about these human systems issues, that those of us who question the
deeper systems theory of true change in human systems, are extremely wary of
accepting anymore. Especially since some of us don't actually think we have
that kind of time to do incremental, incomplete, partial systems change only,
or that it will end up being change that truly transforms or last.
The dramatic and widespread revolution in the more human, emotional, social and
deepest level constructs embodied for instance in deeply transformative
movements like that of Restorative Justice -- using completely altered
constructs of human justice as based in relationships and communications to
truly address conflict, crime and corruption at their deepest roots -- is
gaining widespread adoption in the most punitive of systems (prisons) and the
most stressed and chaotic of places -- such as Sudan. And now, going into
schools -- entrenched and controlled by corporate, political centralized power
-- in the UK and some parts of the US.
The surprise of its spread is the ease and enthusiasm with which these
entrenched power systems are turned on their head, and actual deepest
transformative changes result, despite all the other stresses these systems are
under at the same time.
I just honestly think it is the only way it actually can be done -- the
positive feedback loop of the more necessary, deeper changes that sustain all
the rest? Otherwise, despite all the good "intentions" you often just end up
building the same box with perhaps somewhat changed dimensions but nothing
truly new?
________________________________
From: P2P Foundation mailing list <[email protected]>
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 2, 2015 11:22 AM
Subject: Re: [P2P-F] [Networkedlabour] Another Politics - After Syriza
Hello June,
Thanks for your contribution. The attachment you gave is only the abstract of
the article you mention. Can you give a link to the full article?
Thanks,
Anna
On 29 Jan 2015, at 21:31, P2P Foundation mailing list
<[email protected]> wrote:
Well, I am late to this conversation below but am energized by the fact that
someone else led the charge on these always "never-time-to-fully-excavate" but
in the end, trumping issues of how human beings and ultimately all human
organizations succeed or do not succeed. Either these issues are explicitly
addressed in any "new" government model from its inception and thus run
differently from its inception, or history has taught us they will face
breakdown on the same old deeply taught emotional/social oppression that Anna
so effectively quotes below. Hooray Anna, that you raise your voice on this so
eloquently again. I know the silence that we still face, and I support you for
trying, regardless.
Here's the thing and I will frame this far less eloquently than you did, Anna:
patriarchy is at root a "bully culture". If any true transformational change
is to be imagined, it has to be imagined in an explicitly non-bully "frame"
(non-patriarchal, non-soley-left brain rational quantitative discounting of
qualitative and felt experience and intelligences), from its inception.
Otherwise, as has been the historic reality, once the rational and thoughtful
men finally do get into power you still get "power struggles", (as happened in
the French Revolution, the Russian Revolution, all "revolutions" that didn't
"revolve out" these underlying power premises). This, despite the often truly
"enlightened" and liberating well argued rational dominant understanding that
still doesn't address these deeper emotional social constructs in any explicit
way from the beginning of that "new" power assumption. Thus, ultimately the
"bullies" always end up winning those
power struggles as the old patriarchal paradigm reasserts itself, having never
truly been transformed at the level that it most matters and actually changes
human relationships.
I truly understand and even empathize Michel, with your frustration, so similar
to my rational computer engineering but truly radical thinking husband on these
same "global challenges" -- how big they are, how critical some things are that
must be addressed to retain any possibility of sustainability together, against
the powers amassed against any potential transformation at all. But you will
ultimately find, as Anna and I have pointed out numerous times before with
specific examples even within this organization as with any organization trying
for these deep and true lasting transformations, that the breakdowns will
happen in communication and mostly mis-communication, in emotional
game-playing, in ego battles that no one was willing to prepare for addressing.
Anna and I know they will. We have watched it all our lives from the outside
seats. As have others of either gender, but still on "the outside".
Dante understood this premise as the base of the underlying emotional/social
and cultural construct that currently dominates, which includes patriarchy at
its intrinsic base. A base assumption that generates all of its subsequent
superiority/inferiority divisions which ultimately always come into play
including racism, classicism, elite-educationism, imperialism, homophobia and
numerous others of these most powerful de-railers of cross-cultural
communications within any true "commons" vision of the "people".
You, Syriza, Podemos...all can be understandably overwhelmed with the immediate
political-economic priorities. But there are many who deeply understand that
these socially destructive realities too are a deep priority and the deeper
essence of any true geo-poitical transformation and willing to spend their time
-- if validated and empowered to -- addressing it and reminding you of it, as
an essential priority too, now not later. Or, what we also know deeply is that
without this focus too, any real change will implode on these lines more
completely or...not truly be a "change"of any real transformation in the end,
at all.
For those interested in the deeper context of that kind of true transformation
where it makes the most difference in our resulting human relationships and
organizations, my attached article here for the Journal of Sustainable
Education's next issue (out on Valentine's Day) addresses these concepts
explicitly in, "What has Love Got to do With Transformative Education?"
I don't mind it being disregarded or considered "down in the noise" of the
immediate, pressing "realities". We all have our areas of expertise and
deepest effectiveness. The key is to know when they are blinding you to other
potential huge pitfalls avoidable by listening to and including those "other"
voices that warn you of the areas you are not validating or understanding, as
potentially most destructive to your hopes and dreams in ways you haven't the
ability or natural interest to see and thus prepare for preventing. Because
you'll never get the "time" later, in time to avoid the conflict-constructs
already embedded and allowed to continue at these levels.
Sincerely meant, as I know how deeply you do work on the parts that you do
believe are most critical. Nonetheless, this too can still be done...by others
who know why it also is potentially, just as critical to include, if true
"change" actually is allowed and empowered to happen.
Best hopes,
June
________________________________
From: P2P Foundation mailing list <[email protected]>
To: P2P Foundation mailing list <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2015 6:39 PM
Subject: Re: [P2P-F] [Networkedlabour] Another Politics - After Syriza
After my enthusiastic foray into Otto Scharma's U.Lab I have to report that I
found it another liberal attempt to encourage people to become 'change makers',
supporting them in a self blaming exercise, where fear and greed are seen as
the problems of our social dis/ease, without linking this to social and
economic pressures.
Some good ideas of deep listening, connecting head, heart and will, moving from
ego to Eco, focussing on what is emerging, but falling short of a radical
critique which could reveal the enormity of the task in hand.
Going beyond the shift in consciousness required to let go of old habits of
thinking, takes us to an unexplored place on the edge of what we know. Few are
willing to go there, because everywhere we judge, and we are judged, by what we
know. In this culture ruled by science, there does not seem to be any room or
any relevance for not knowing. Yet I persist in trying to bring it to the
attention of those on this email list.
Anna
On 28 Jan 2015, at 10:57, Anna Harris <[email protected]> wrote:
A very different answer to the same question from Otto Scharma :
[–]rodneyrod 6 points 6 days ago
Otto, as you have worked with change makers across the globe where have you
seen the most resistance/discomfort in people as they attempt to enter the
"presencing" stage of listening? How can those observations assist us as we
open this journey to others?
* perma-link
[–]OttoScharmer[S] 5 points 6 days ago
i have found that most people who, regardless of their sector, are exposed to
real world change, and have to hold the space for people related changes (or
are exposed to the creative process one way or another) are already well
prepared to drop to these deeper levels of operating. so where is it not the
case? with people who are stuck in powerpoints worlds of headquarters and
politics--sometimes also people that are just very remote of real reality, like
old style academia... but overall i am VERY surprised how significant the
readiness for these deeper levels are --although that readiness is usually not
conscious (yet)
* perma-link
* parent
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 5:01 PM, P2P Foundation mailing list
<[email protected]> wrote:
hi Anna,
>
>
>At the p2p foundation we stress personal and interpersonal change and
>facilitation, but at the same time, we have to be realistic in this, what is
>already possible but very difficult in small groups of committed people may
>not be possible for society at large ... For understanding this, and though
>I'm critical of the authoritarian interpretations of that tradition, the
>integral psychology of clare graves remains fundamental ..
>
>
>Detailed studies by Susan Cook-Greuters have determined that at most 2% of the
>population have integrative consciousness, with 30% more or less having this
>as a aspirational consciousness ..
>
>
>I take great comfort in the growth of participative culture and skills now
>evident in the new mutualized working spaces but this is far from being the
>general culture ..
>
>
>Again, referring to the scheme of John Heron, I would say that for the greater
>masses, we are at the potential change of stage 2 to 3, with significant
>minorities at four ..
>
>
>so here is how I see it:
>
>
>* develop fully participative cultures for mature peer producing communities
>
>
>* develop deeper participative potentialities for the aspirational parts of
>the population (active citizenship)
>
>
>* embed participative process in the general social technology of our time, to
>upgrade the general culture ..
>
>
>A lot then further depends on the relative positioning of scarcity vs
>abundance dynamics ...
>
>
>for abundance context, the generalization of peer governance is very realistic
>
>
>for scarcity contexts, the choice between hierarchical,
>democratic-representative, and market-driven allocation mechanisms remains
>entirely open
>
>
>see for example how the wikipedia re-introduced a rather toxic bureaucracy by
>re-introducing artificial scarcity ... (notability requirements to be decide
>by elite editors)
>
>
>just today, I am involved in a frustrating dialogue with a feminist activist
>who did not even want to share even excerpts of her book on 'moneyless living'
>.. in other words, she is creating a artificial scarcity of her own book, that
>is technically freely copyable, in order to 'swap' it in exchange for
>something else ... reproducing the artificial scarcities in so-called
>advanced milieus ... moneyless living for those that have the money to buy it
>..
>
>
>I'm sure you can find similar contradictions in all of us, including me ..
>
>
>in conclusion, we are not ready to shed relative domination processes for any
>pure egalitarianism any time soon,
>
>
>Michel
>
>
>On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 1:05 PM, Anna Harris <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>Amid all the euphoria in celebrating the Greek landslide, and following
>Michel's integrative approach, the points in the article below need to be
>emphasised. We all carry within us the wounds of oppression however much we
>feel we have cast them aside, and they will surface again in the new post
>capitalist structures unless we put some focus individually and collectively
>on healing ourselves and becoming whole.
>>
>>
>>'the wounding through oppression that we all experience shows up in our
>>organizing, and have permeated organizational culture except where the
>>influence of feminists and others committed to transformational work has
>>created a different way of creating structure, that prioritizes a strategy
>>and collective struggle rooted in healing and wholeness.'
>>
>>
>>Pauli Friere spoke about this in his Pedagogy of the Oppressed.
>>
>>
>>What does that mean? How do we do that? Often it seems there isn't time to go
>>into this now, let's get into power first, then we can see to these issues.
>>That's when the multitude becomes an instrument, and arguments between
>>hierarchy and horizontality appear to be abstract concepts with no people
>>involved.
>>
>>
>>How do we become more fully human in our relationships with each other? What
>>makes it particularly difficult is that there is no ready made formula -
>>follow these steps and you will get there. No. This is a step into the
>>unknown. But that also makes it an exciting exploration.
>>
>>
>>Anna
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>On 25 Jan 2015, at 11:38, P2P Foundation mailing list
>><[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>https://www.opendemocracy.net/transformation/andrew-willis-garc%C3%A9s/another-politics%E2%80%94from-anticolonial-to-occupy
>>Another Politics-from
anti-colonial to Occupy
>>>Chris Dixon's new book identifies four principles that
underpin the success of transformative social movements.
>>>
>>>
>>>Andrew Willis Garcés 7 January 2015
>>>
>>>
>>>[This article originally appeared inWaging
Nonviolence.]
>>>
>>>Seven years ago I worked at a tenant and worker organizing group in
Washington, D.C. We referred to ourselves as a "movement-building"
organization, but weren't always clear what we meant by that. One
evening I was out door-knocking with one of our members, James, an
African American man in his 50s. He asked me about a conference some
of us had attended in Atlanta the previous week, the U.S. Social
Forum.
>>>
>>>"What was the big theme there that stuck out to you?" he
asked.
>>>
>>>It was a good question. At that moment, the DJ Unk song "Walk It
Out" was booming from a nearby car.
>>>
>>>"Well, I was most impressed by the groups that really try to walk
out their beliefs-connecting all the dots between racism,
capitalism, even imperialism, and the inner work we have to do as
people to overcome the things we've learned."
>>>
>>>I explained more about what that meant to me.
>>>
>>>He shook his head, amused.
>>>
>>>"That's a tall order!" He thought about it a little more.
"When will we get time for all that?"
>>>
>>>That tall order is the subject of Chris Dixon's bookAnother
Politics, newly released by University of California Press. The
product of dozens of interviews conducted with community organizers
over the last decade, the book is an excellent distillation of what
Dixon calls "another politics," a shared political orientation
that unites grassroots organizers working from similar principles in
the United States and Canada across issue, movement, sector, strategy
and identity.
>>>
>>>Through the interviews, he identifies four core principles that unite
left "anti-authoritarian" organizers across different "strands"
of struggle, transcending traditional notions of issue-based
organization:
>>>. being against domination of all kinds;
>>>. prioritizing the development of new social relations and
forms of social organization in the process of struggle;
>>>. linking struggles for improvements in people's lives
to long-term transformative visions; and
>>>. grassroots organizing from the bottom-up.
>>>
>>>
>>>In regards to these different strands, he writes, "We braid
them together as we work collectively and build relationships across
politics, campaigns and movements: anarchist labor organizers draw on
analytical frameworks from women of color feminism; radical queer
activists use community-based models for dealing with violence,
developed by anti-racist feminists and prison abolitionists."
>>>
>>>
>>>He explores how Occupy Wall Street, anti-colonial movements, and
INCITE! Women of Color Against Violence, among other groups, have
contributed to developing "another politics" across decades.
>>>
>>>
>>>Dixon digs even deeper, characterizing organizations practicing
"another politics" as being explicit about their "collective
refusal" of oppression-specifically, as incorporating "the four
anti's" of : anti-authoritarianism; anti-capitalism;
anti-oppression; and anti-imperialism, into their work. This left me
wondering how some organizations might "fit" this taxonomy-what
if your group has a handle on economic exploitation, for instance, but
relies on charismatic leadership?
>>>
>>>But Dixon is nevertheless clear about organizations that he sees as
practicing "another politics," and the book is most compelling
when he recounts movement-building victories, like the story of
Canada's multi-city immigrant rights groupNo One is
Illegal:
>>>"In a stunning December 2007 action, some 2,000 people,
largely South Asian, blockaded the Vancouver International Airport to
stop Singh's impending deportation. And starting with an
'Education Not Deportation' campaign in 2006, NOII-Toronto launched
a multi-year fight for Toronto to become a solidarity city, where all
people can access city services regardless of immigration status.
Organizing across sectors and services, they finally won in
2013."
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>Dixon also uses the book to highlight "ideas rarely in
writing," exploring dynamics of movement-building organization that
don't get much print. For instance, he writes about the process of
integrating not just issue lenses but our whole selves-creating
community and organization that operates at the speed of the
whole.
>>>
>>>
>>>As Dixon writes, "recognizing and deliberately fostering
feelings and relationships as essential ingredients for transformative
struggle" is still not a widespread practice, and he points out that
this is not a new phenomenon, as the Black Panthers and Student
Nonviolent Coordinating Committee also sought "to develop common
expectations about how people should treat one another."
>>>
>>>
>>>Continuing this thread, he also counts as emergent practices
among "another politics" practitioners, forms of organizing that
affirm families and domestic and reproductive work simultaneously with
challenging systemic inequity, and moving beyond an individual-focused
anti-oppression politics.
>>>
>>>
>>>Dixon and the people he interviews point out that the wounding
through oppression that we all experience shows up in our organizing,
and have permeated organizational culture except where the influence
of feminists and others committed to transformational work has created
a different way of creating structure, that prioritizes a strategy and
collective struggle rooted in healing and wholeness. This increasing
focus on wholeness and wellness, seen in the recent popularity of
integrating somatics and other healing disciplines into community
organizing, can only make us more adept at building a broader and more
resilient web of movements.
>>>
>>>And Dixon helps unpack the challenges unique to movement-building
organizations, which, he says, must move towards specific victories
and goals, while also moving through a process that creates new ways
of being, doing and relating, that avoid replicating oppressive
practices. All while avoiding "ruts" common to anti-authoritarian
groups, like knee-jerk non-hierarchy, and the "burn bright, burn
out" cycle of organizations that rise and fall quickly.
>>>
>>>
>>>Dixon illustrates this point with a fantastic metaphor offered by
Project South's Steph Guillioud, comparing different forms of
organization to different kinds of cars suited to particular
functions:
>>>"The variations in vehicles don't change the map, they
don't change the road, they don't change the need for people to
drive and people in the back or the people moving it. We will always
have and need the people who can push it and the people that can work
on the insides, the people who can never get a ride, et
cetera."
>>>
>>>
>>>It's rare to find a book on social movements written explicitly
for people with less academic credentials than its author. Dixon, who
wrote the book for a PhD program, takes care to explain terms as they
come up; he doesn't assume we know about ethnography ("analyzing
lived culture while experiencing it"). And he gives his interviewees
plenty of airtime to put their own spin on, for instance, "affective
organizing," which becomes "not being a fucking asshole," in the
wonderfully succinct words of Bay Area activist Harjit Singh Gill.
>>>
>>>Still, the number of concepts he introduces feels overwhelming at
times, and I longed for a glossary or flow chart when concepts like
"non-instrumental organizing" popped up (which, it's worth noting,
refers to the analysis and strategies people can create when they come
together in dialogue and struggle as peers, as opposed to treating
people as instruments to be manipulated, or pieces on a figurative
chess board to mobilize toward a predetermined end).
>>>
>>>"Anti-authoritarian," then, could be shorthand for "principled
organizing"-organizing that gets down to the roots, that refuses
to settle for electing a slightly better candidate, for selling out
our potential allies to scoop up a superficial win, or that sees the
path to victory as anything less than the destination itself.
>>>
>>>Towards the end of the book, I was reminded of my exchange that day
with James. Clearly, as Dixon demonstrates, there are mixed-class
organizations that make time for individual and collective healing
practices, for skillshares and strategy seminars, for discussion
groups, for intentionally developing and evaluating leadership, and
for developing organizational structure. But increasingly, as people
are forced to work longer hours for lower incomes, I have to wonder:
How are organizations adapting to support their people to do more with
less?
>>>
>>>I longed for more detail on what day-to-day life is like for an
organizer in the six specifically-chosen cities from which Dixon chose
his interview subjects. What does it look like to practice "another
politics" in Atlanta, for instance? It's worth asking, given that
the book is structured around questions like, "How can we most
productively manifest our visions through our organizing work?" Like
a good organizing mentor, Dixon (and his interviewees) gives us
insight without "right" answers, helping to deepen our
understanding of commonalities and remind us of the deep roots of the
"another politics" leftist lineage.
>>>
>>>
>>> (((((( )))))
>>>
>>>
>>>Andrew Willis Garcés works with Training for
Change and has led trainings for immigrant activists in several US
states on campaign strategy and civil disobedience. Read more of his
work at www.porvida.org/.
>>>
_______________________________________________
>>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>NetworkedLabour mailing list
>>[email protected]
>>http://lists.contrast.org/mailman/listinfo/networkedlabour
>>
>>
>
>
>
>--
>
>Check out the Commons Transition Plan here at:
>http://en.wiki.floksociety.org/w/Research_Plan
>
>P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net
>
>Updates: http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens
>
>#82 on the (En)Rich list: http://enrichlist.org/the-complete-list/
>
>_______________________________________________
>P2P Foundation - Mailing list
>http://www.p2pfoundation.net
>https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation
>
>
_______________________________________________
P2P Foundation - Mailing list
http://www.p2pfoundation.net
https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation
<What_s Love Got To Do With Transformative Education-10-31-14-Revised.pdf>
_______________________________________________
P2P Foundation - Mailing list
http://www.p2pfoundation.net
https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation
_______________________________________________
P2P Foundation - Mailing list
http://www.p2pfoundation.net
https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation_______________________________________________
P2P Foundation - Mailing list
http://www.p2pfoundation.net
https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation
