Yes. I think the authors are clear. This has to be an international movement, 
with long term goals, rather than national or local political aims. 

"It would mean building upon the post-nation-state territory of 'the stack' - 
that global infrastructure that enables our digital world today".

Could others enlighten what is meant by 'the stack'?

Anna

> On 3 Nov 2015, at 02:18, Michel Bauwens <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I don't see how this is contradictory,
> 
> we don't have the power to implement this in the world, 'all at once' but 
> certain regions and countries can set the example ; there are also groups 
> working for a global BIG but I can't recall the name for now
> 
> At least while we wait for this, 
> http://p2pfoundation.net/International_Simultaneous_Policy_Organization
> 
>> On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 6:40 AM, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Well, the problem is more that it is not very well thought out and coming 
>> out over 50 years after Jorn's Situationists and Automation I feel we should 
>> have something a bit more coherent. (I am sorry, I was just reading that 
>> this afternoon)
>>  
>> If the idea is that this is universal, i.e. guaranteed to everyone 
>> regardless of their national documentation, immigration status etc. etc. 
>> well then it does have profound implications. But hey, I don't think that's 
>> what is being discussed - can anyone go to Brazil and get some of this 
>> B.I.G.?
>>  
>> Anything else reinforces xenophobia as can be seen in the UK where 
>> anti-immigration sentiments have been whipped up by talk about benefit 
>> tourism.
>>  
>> I don't understand how having B.I.G. in one country can take us much further 
>> than another debased form of socialism in one country?
>>  
>> all the best
>>  
>> Fabian
>>  
>>  
>>> On 02 November 2015 at 12:36 Michel Bauwens <[email protected]> 
>>> wrote:    
>>> 
>>> agreed, 
>>>  
>>> but I think there is one thing that proponents underestimate,
>>>  
>>> as Polanyi showed, making labour into a commodity was really central for 
>>> capitalism, and the basic income would profoundly undo that, in fact making 
>>> labour into a commons,
>>>  
>>> it is worth fighting for, but let's not imagine it will be easy as this is 
>>> in fact a very radical proposal, which will overturn a lot of common logics 
>>> .. for example, it is likely that intellectual jobs will be paid less, 
>>> physical labor more, as no one will want to do them,
>>>  
>>> Michel
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 7:32 PM, Anna Harris <[email protected]> wrote: 
>>>  
>>> I agree with you Michel, it is not necessary to the argument for basic 
>>> income. But it enables us to see the necessity for the BI rather than 
>>> seeing it as just a utopian dream. The lack of jobs, and the continued 
>>> demand for people to be in work, makes no sense unless you see it in the 
>>> background of developing automation which is replacing labour, and which is 
>>> traditionally resisted by labour. It is this attitude which needs to open 
>>> to seeing automation as serving our interests rather than being the enemy 
>>> which deprives us of work.
>>>  
>>> Anna
>>> 
>>> On 2 Nov 2015, at 12:05, Michel Bauwens < [email protected]> wrote: 
>>> 
>>>> this hypothesis weakens the book in my opinion, it is not necessary to 
>>>> posit this to be for the basic income ...
>>>>  
>>>> Michel
>>>> 
>>>> On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 6:47 PM, Anna Harris <[email protected]> wrote: 
>>>>  
>>>> Good question Ursula, and not one I can answer fully. It is the term the 
>>>> authors use on the book cover.
>>>> They say: 
>>>> "FULL AUTOMATION
>>>> With automation.......machines can increasingly produce all necessary 
>>>> goods and services, while also releasing humanity from the effort of 
>>>> producing them. For this reason, we argue that the tendencies towards 
>>>> automation and the replacement of human labour should be enthusiastically 
>>>> accelerated and targeted as a political project of the left. This is a 
>>>> project that takes an existing capitalist tendency and seeks to push it 
>>>> beyond the acceptable parameters of capitalist social relations." (P109)
>>>>  
>>>> A vision of a post work society where people's time is free to use as they 
>>>> wish is the basis for this demand. If this becomes a project of the left, 
>>>> hopefully there is more possibility to influence and guide this tendency 
>>>> so that it serves all of humanity rather than just the few. 
>>>>  
>>>> Anna
>>>> 
>>>>> On 2 Nov 2015, at 10:00, Ursula Huws < 
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> What do you mean by ‘full automation’? Ursula
>>>>> 
>>>>>  
>>>>> 
>>>>> From: Anna Harris [mailto:[email protected]] 
>>>>> Sent: 02 November 2015 09:19
>>>>> To: [email protected]; 
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> Cc: Ursula Huws <[email protected]>
>>>>> Subject: NEW FROM VERSO: INVENTING THE FUTURE BY NICK SRNICEK AND ALEX 
>>>>> WILLIAMS
>>>>> 
>>>>>  
>>>>> 
>>>>> This book offers the framework of building a campaign strategy around the 
>>>>> demand for full automation and a basic income for all. This is not a 
>>>>> short term demand but a vision of what can be achieved if labour groups 
>>>>> come together with academics and supporters to design the future. 
>>>>> 
>>>>>  
>>>>> 
>>>>> Personally I believe they have drawn the supporting network too narrowly. 
>>>>> But that only makes the case for this campaign even more strongly. I 
>>>>> wrote some time ago:
>>>>> 
>>>>>  
>>>>> 
>>>>> BIG (basic income guaranteed) may be revolutionary, but it does not need 
>>>>> the economic system to change drastically in order to be introduced. In 
>>>>> that sense it is reformist, although the effects are revolutionary. 
>>>>> The big advantages are that 
>>>>> 1. it can be introduced without massive changes to the economic system. 
>>>>> 2. It is a very simple idea which can be appreciated by people without 
>>>>> much knowledge of the economy.
>>>>> 3. It has been tried in pilot experiments, and found to be successful in 
>>>>> stimulating economic activity. (Brazil)
>>>>> 4. Many economists agree (James Robertson, Jeremy Rifkin, Edward Snowden, 
>>>>> Richard Swift) that with technology replacing many jobs that previously 
>>>>> required human labour, BIG of some sort is necessary.
>>>>> 5. Naomi Klein highlights it in her latest book This Changes Everything, 
>>>>> as one of the game changing battles that 'don't merely aim to change 
>>>>> laws, but changes patterns of thought.'(p 641)
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> The authors are coming to Leeds for an open discussion on Nov 14.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> https://www.facebook.com/events/1624336424483090/
>>>>> 
>>>>>  
>>>>> 
>>>>> I believe that this campaign could appeal widely across all political 
>>>>> spectrums, and would welcome more discussion on this list.
>>>>> 
>>>>>  
>>>>> 
>>>>> Anna
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________ 
>>>> NetworkedLabour mailing list 
>>>> [email protected] 
>>>> http://lists.contrast.org/mailman/listinfo/networkedlabour 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>  
>>>> -- 
>>>> Check out the Commons Transition Plan here at: 
>>>> http://commonstransition.org  
>>>>  
>>>> P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net  - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net 
>>>> 
>>>> Updates: http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens 
>>>> 
>>>> #82 on the (En)Rich list: http://enrichlist.org/the-complete-list/
>>> 
>>> 
>>>  
>>> -- 
>>> Check out the Commons Transition Plan here at: http://commonstransition.org 
>>>  
>>>  
>>> P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net  - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net 
>>> 
>>> Updates: http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens 
>>> 
>>> #82 on the (En)Rich list: http://enrichlist.org/the-complete-list/
>>> _______________________________________________ 
>>> NetworkedLabour mailing list 
>>> [email protected] 
>>> http://lists.contrast.org/mailman/listinfo/networkedlabour
>> 
>>  
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Check out the Commons Transition Plan here at: http://commonstransition.org  
> 
> P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net  - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net 
> 
> Updates: http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens
> 
> #82 on the (En)Rich list: http://enrichlist.org/the-complete-list/ 

_______________________________________________
P2P Foundation - Mailing list

Blog - http://www.blog.p2pfoundation.net
Wiki - http://www.p2pfoundation.net

Show some love and help us maintain and update our knowledge commons by making 
a donation. Thank you for your support.
https://blog.p2pfoundation.net/donation

https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation

Reply via email to