yeah, china will go broadband; but I think the technology would be better used
to move into places like India/Africa/South America...etc.
Enzo Michelangeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Not so "third": in 2006, 123 M users of which 77 M on broadband:
http://www.cnnic.net.cn/download/2006/18threport-en.pdf .
(and that doesn't include us in Hong Kong...)
Enzo
----- Original Message -----
From: Lemon Obrien
To: theory and practice of decentralized computer networks
Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 9:03 AM
Subject: RE: [p2p-hackers] Xunlei
So google is moving to the third world by way of fast downloads for
antiquated systems.
Alex Pankratov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Apparently the toolbar is already bundled with Download Accelerator
Plus. See a small insert on the left-hand side about half way down
the page - http://www.speedbit.com
There's got to be a better reason for G wanting to buy Xunlei.
Alex
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Travis Kalanick
> Sent: Friday, December 29, 2006 12:20 PM
> To: 'theory and practice of decentralized computer networks'
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [p2p-hackers] Xunlei
>
> Google would be interested in that if it meant that their toolbar was
> bundled with every Xunlei client. I don't know Chinese, but
> did see the
> Google Toolbar offered up with the Xunlei downloader:
>
> http://my.xunlei.com/setup.htm
>
>
> T
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Tien Tuan Anh Dinh
> Sent: Friday, December 29, 2006 10:53 AM
> To: theory and practice of decentralized computer networks
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [p2p-hackers] Xunlei
>
> David Barrett wrote:
> > Wow, very interesting. I can see the value of downloading
> in parallel
> from
> > multiple mirrors (though I'm surprised that enough content is
> "accidentally
> > mirrored" on multiple webservers to make this feature
> valuable in the
> > general case).
> So it only works iff the downloaded file was duplicated on
> more than one
> servers and someone else must have downloaded from some other
> servers ? I
> can't find a reason why Google would be interested in that.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> p2p-hackers mailing list
> p2p-hackers@lists.zooko.com
> http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers
>
> _______________________________________________
> p2p-hackers mailing list
> p2p-hackers@lists.zooko.com
> http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers
_______________________________________________
p2p-hackers mailing list
p2p-hackers@lists.zooko.com
http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers
You don't get no juice unless you squeeze
Lemon Obrien, the Third.
http://www.tamago.us
---------------------------------
_______________________________________________
p2p-hackers mailing list
p2p-hackers@lists.zooko.com
http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers
_______________________________________________
p2p-hackers mailing list
p2p-hackers@lists.zooko.com
http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers
You don't get no juice unless you squeeze
Lemon Obrien, the Third.
http://www.tamago.us_______________________________________________
p2p-hackers mailing list
p2p-hackers@lists.zooko.com
http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers
