Gwendal,
This may be waiting on me for just a bit longer (~1 month), as I'm trying to reorganize the transport layer to be modular so
that such an integration will be almost trivial. I hope to have an interface that just asks for a socket or to send a datagram to
an IP:port, and the corresponding callbacks. This will make it much easier than searching the existing codebase for the places
where sockets are opened or datagrams are sent.
I know of some folks on our mailing list who are looking into integration of Limewire's STUN impl. However, because of our
differing licenses (Limewire is GPL, FreePastry is BSD-like) the distribution may be a bit tricky. I imagine we'll figure out
those details when the time comes. Perhaps someone can start a SourceForge project for that.
-Jeff
SIMON Gwendal wrote:
On 3/13/07, *Jeff Hoye* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
NAT support is currently limited to users who can set up port
forwarding, or have UPnP, but some of our users are investigating
integration STUN to expand this capability.
For student internships, we also consider some devs on networking issues
related to DHT, especially NAT traversal and IPv6. We would be pleased
to contribute. Is there any coordinated action on this topics in the
FreePastry community ?
Cheers,
-- Gwendal
http://enstb.org/~gsimon
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
p2p-hackers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers
_______________________________________________
p2p-hackers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers
