well, if you know the data is the same, and finger-printing media so people can 
steal better is already well known; isn't, the many to one download solution 
the best, since average broadband is 6x faster for downloading.
   
  i think snowcap tried the finger printing solution until the realized they 
were't making money. original idea. now, who knows what they're doing....but, 
from what i've heard, its still not working.
   
  lem

coderman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
  On 4/12/07, Justin Chapweske wrote:
> ... I view this paper as an extension
> of those techniques for a use in a decentralized system with the
> constraint of uncorrelated sources... Since this research
> focuses on on the effectiveness of the technique for uncorrelated
> sources, I'm led to conclude that the focal use case is piracy.

uncorrelated sources == decentralized
decentralized == piracy?

i still believe in the resilience and robustness of decentralized
networking technologies. meraki is deploying a mesh downtown.
zeroconf/rendezvous more popular by the day. here.>

the usability and collaborative aspects of such decentralization (when
well applied) are empowering and positive, despite potential abuses.


> Maybe the title is misleading, but "Computer scientists develop P2P
> system that promises faster music, movie downloads" primarily applies
> to illegal file sharing as far as I'm concerned.

agreed. i understand why such a target is well suited for study and
experimentation, but music/movies will inevitably be tied to piracy as
a first reaction. this doesn't obviate the many other uses (in
decentralized contexts) where this same technique can be applied for
positive/ethical/legal purposes though...


> These approaches
> will do little if anything to speed up one->many movie and music
> distribution systems.

these centralized distribution systems are the only legitimate form?


> ... I think there are simpler and more efficient techniques for
> delta-compression for most of the legitimate uses.

we're back to decentralized == illegitimate again.

i understand the negativity toward their chosen subject (a poor one,
admittedly). i still find it hard to see how all decentralized uses
can be viewed as illegitimate.

best regards,
_______________________________________________
p2p-hackers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers



You don't get no juice unless you squeeze
Lemon Obrien, the Third.

http://www.tamago.us
_______________________________________________
p2p-hackers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers

Reply via email to