On 19/12/10 3:58 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:

> (I even suspect it is impossible to find a pure P2P secure solution,
> where all peers would stay equal. It is just a personal suspicion not,
> it seems, a scientifically proven result.)

Hmmm, a challenge :)  How about:

1.  Security only means something in the context of people.
2.  All people are different.
3.  Therefore, all security systems will be non-symmetric.
4.  And a pure secure (technical) solution is impossible, including any 
technical notions of symmetry.  QED!

The mistake would be thinking that a technical P2P system can deliver a 
security system.  It can't really, what it can do is deliver a set of 
technical characteristics which might form part of a security system as 
per its users' demands.

iang
_______________________________________________
p2p-hackers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers

Reply via email to