I see that the contemporary P2P networks employ distinct URI
        schemes (such as freenet:, but also magnet:) and top-level
        domains (such as .gnunet) for their operation.  Which makes me
        wonder, if there're plans, or possibility, that such schemes and
        domains will be registered (reserved?) with IANA?

        Alternatively, is it possible to switch to and register a single
        TLD (such as .p2p, or perhaps .dec, for “decentralized”, or some
        other), the subdomains for the current P2P networks could be put
        under (such as: .bit.p2p, .gnunet.p2p, .onion.p2p, etc.)?

        Also, as I've mentioned earlier, the particular URI syntax
        employed by GNUnet seems a bit odd.  Namely, as per [1], I'd
        expect the SCHEME://AUTHORITY/... form to never be used for
        decentralized identifiers (such as those used by GNUnet), and
        the form such as SCHEME:NAMESPACE:IDENTIFIER to be used instead.
        Like:

gnunet:ecrs:chk:9E4MDN4VULE8KJG6U1C8FKH5HA8C5CHSJTILRTTPGK8MJ6VHORERHE68JU8Q0FDTOH1DGLUJ3NLE99N0ML0N9PIBAGKG7MNPBTT6UKG.1I823C58O3LKS24LLI9KB384LH82LGF9GUQRJHACCUINSCQH36SI4NF88CMAET3T3BHI93D4S0M5CC6MVDL1K8GFKVBN69Q6T307U6O.17992

        Or perhaps a form with leading urn:gnunet: instead, in line with
        at least some (but probably the majority) of the URN namespaces
        currently registered.  The same applies to freenet:
        vs. urn:freenet:, BTW.

[1] urn:ietf:rfc:3986
    urn:ietf:std:66
    http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3986

-- 
FSF associate member #7257

_______________________________________________
p2p-hackers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers

Reply via email to