On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 01:54:14AM +0700,
 Ivan Shmakov <[email protected]> wrote 
 a message of 50 lines which said:

>       What I'm interested in right now is where this I-D is being
>       discussed, as I feel that the empty-authority (ni:///) form is
>       unwarranted there just as well, and a no-authority URI (ni:)
>       should be used instead.  (Just like the news: examples above,
>       but contrary to the file: URI scheme.)

Nobody remembers but note that file:/// also has three slashes for "no
authority".
_______________________________________________
p2p-hackers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers

Reply via email to