David Barrett wrote:
Yikes, that's pretty bad. Did you also capture which fraction of clients
report that UPnP works at all?
Not sure I follow. How would you define these clients ?
> We use UPnP but aren't currently tuned to
capture this information, though I'll plan to in the future.
When building your UPnP layer, did you find that the various routers were
faithful to the spec, or was there a lot of tweaking for specific NAT
vendors?
No, not much tweaking at all .. One thing that was evident is a
difference in response time. For example some Linksys models may
take up to 5 seconds to respond to AddPortMapping request.
_______________________________________________
p2p-hackers mailing list
[email protected]
http://zgp.org/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers
_______________________________________________
Here is a web page listing P2P Conferences:
http://www.neurogrid.net/twiki/bin/view/Main/PeerToPeerConferences
