David Barrett wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Alex Pankratov
David Barrett wrote:
Yikes, that's pretty bad. Did you also capture which fraction of
clients
report that UPnP works at all?
Not sure I follow. How would you define these clients ?
Sorry, I was unclear. I mean, "what fraction of NAT'd clients have NATs
that respond 200OK to your UPnP SOAP attempt?"
I'm just curious how widely UPnP is deployed.
Ah. That'd be a interesting statistics to have indeed, but - no -
I don't have it at the moment.
_______________________________________________
p2p-hackers mailing list
[email protected]
http://zgp.org/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers
_______________________________________________
Here is a web page listing P2P Conferences:
http://www.neurogrid.net/twiki/bin/view/Main/PeerToPeerConferences
