sorry for mine cutting in, 2008/1/29, Roy, Radhika R Dr CTR USA USAMC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Please see my inputs inline [RRR] > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Song Yongchao > Date: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 6:06 > Subject: RE: [P2PSIP] Open issues with client has multiple associated peers > To: 'Song Yongchao' , 'P2PSIP Mailing List' > > > I need to modify the second question to make it more clear. > > > > I think most proposals agree that one client can have multiple > > associatedpeers to keep the service continuity. The open issues are: > > > > (1) Should there be a primary associated peer? And when this peer > > fails, the > > client switches to another associated peer? I am not sure of about it. > > [RRR] I think the answer is none from the protocol point of view. However, if > clients wants to make something as its primary, secondary, etc., it should be > left for implementations. It is a different area how a client will these > choices. [Hui] I have different image here, there could be client involvement for this, for example, peer could say himself being a primary, who else being a secondary through client protocl extension, make sense?
-Hui _______________________________________________ P2PSIP mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
