I need to modify the second question to make it more clear. I think most proposals agree that one client can have multiple associated peers to keep the service continuity. The open issues are: (1) Should there be a primary associated peer? And when this peer fails, the client switches to another associated peer? I am not sure of about it. (2)Should the client learn more peers information that can be the client's associated peers through its now associated peer? And when one of its associated peers fails, it joins another to keep enough associated peers for choice? I think probably this is what we needed. (3)Should there be a notification mechanism between a client and its associated peer? So the client can timely know the status of the associated peer, and avoid choosing the congested or busy peer to serve him? I think we do need it. Best Regards, Song Yongchao Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________ P2PSIP mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
