Well, we do have to wait until the minutes are posted (coming very soon I hope). Usually, the language we use is "confirm" consensus on the list. In this case, we had no meeting consensus. I think it would be quite unlikely that there will be list consensus given the result of the hum in the meeting.
Now, if we do see list consensus in some direction, great. Just to be clear, in the meeting, there was no consensus to adopt RELOAD-03 as a working group item, and there was not even a proposal to adopt any other document. The sense of the room was to let the authors of RELOAD-03 do another revision, and then revisit the issue after that. "Sense of the room" means nothing, process-wise. Brian -----Original Message----- From: Spencer Dawkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 9:38 AM To: Brian Rosen; 'Dean Willis' Cc: 'P2PSIP Mailing List'; Peterson, Jon Subject: Re: [P2PSIP] Just to be clear... It is, of course, reasonable to point out that the chairs have to determine consensus on the mailing list, no matter what that sense of the room was, so if the sense of the room wasn't the right thing to do, this would be a great time for the working group to figure that out. Thanks, Spencer _______________________________________________ P2PSIP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
