Gonzalo, I would be interested in an updated evaluation from you on the practical (near term) potential of using HIP NAT traversal for P2PSIP. There was even talk of running code.
Can you (and anyone else) share a few key thoughts, references and links to running code? Henry -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gonzalo Camarillo Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 5:47 AM To: mmusic Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; David Ward Subject: [MMUSIC] HIP NAT Traversal using NICE Folks involved in the MMUSIC WG, the HIP WG is developing a NAT traversal solution that is based on NICE: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-hip-nat-traversal-03.txt http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-rosenberg-mmusic-ice-nonsip-00 .txt This means that we depend on the NICE draft to have a working NAT traversal solution for HIP. However, from the presentation of this draft in the last IETF, it is not clear to us whether or not the MMUSIC WG is going to work on this draft. The HIP WG would like to encourage the MMUSIC WG to work on this specification, since we need it. If the MMUSIC WG decides not to do so, the HIP WG will most likely copy/paste the contents of the NICE draft in our NAT traversal spec. However, we believe that having a stand-alone NICE specification can be useful for protocols other than HIP that will decide to use ICE for NAT traversal in the future. A clarification of the status of this work in the MMUSIC WG would be appreciated. Thanks, Gonzalo HIP WG co-chair _______________________________________________ mmusic mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic _______________________________________________ P2PSIP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
