Thanks Miika and Gonzalo! Can you keep us advised of the interoperability work? This will have IMO very beneficial effects for the whole industry.
Henry -----Original Message----- From: Gonzalo Camarillo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 2:08 AM To: Miika Komu Cc: Henry Sinnreich; mmusic; P2PSIP Mailing List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; David Ward Subject: Re: [P2PSIP] [MMUSIC] HIP NAT Traversal using NICE Hi, yes, as Miika points out, there are several groups working on it. We should be doing the first interop tests between different implementations shortly. Cheers, Gonzalo Miika Komu wrote: > On Wed, 2 Apr 2008, Henry Sinnreich wrote: > > Hi Henry, > > NAT traversal implementations are work in progress at least for the > following projects: > > http://www.hip4inter.net/ > http://www.openhip.org/ > http://www.infrahip.net/ > >> Gonzalo, >> >> I would be interested in an updated evaluation from you on the practical >> (near term) potential of using HIP NAT traversal for P2PSIP. >> There was even talk of running code. >> >> Can you (and anyone else) share a few key thoughts, references and links >> to running code? >> >> Henry >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf >> Of Gonzalo Camarillo >> Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 5:47 AM >> To: mmusic >> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]; David Ward >> Subject: [MMUSIC] HIP NAT Traversal using NICE >> >> Folks involved in the MMUSIC WG, >> >> the HIP WG is developing a NAT traversal solution that is based on NICE: >> >> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-hip-nat-traversal-03.txt >> >> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-rosenberg-mmusic-ice-nonsip-00 >> .txt >> >> This means that we depend on the NICE draft to have a working NAT >> traversal solution for HIP. However, from the presentation of this draft >> >> in the last IETF, it is not clear to us whether or not the MMUSIC WG is >> going to work on this draft. >> >> The HIP WG would like to encourage the MMUSIC WG to work on this >> specification, since we need it. If the MMUSIC WG decides not to do so, >> the HIP WG will most likely copy/paste the contents of the NICE draft in >> >> our NAT traversal spec. However, we believe that having a stand-alone >> NICE specification can be useful for protocols other than HIP that will >> decide to use ICE for NAT traversal in the future. >> >> A clarification of the status of this work in the MMUSIC WG would be >> appreciated. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Gonzalo >> HIP WG co-chair >> _______________________________________________ >> mmusic mailing list >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic >> _______________________________________________ >> P2PSIP mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip >> > _______________________________________________ P2PSIP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
