Hi, On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 9:51 PM, David A. Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Not a bad idea, from my perspective. I think early on we did it to > distinguish what we talking about from the more general term, but > eliminating the P2PSIP labels sounds ok to me. Interested to see what > others think.
I agree on using no P2PSIP labels and suggest that we use P2P terminology common in the technical literature. Thanks, -- Victor Pascual Ávila _______________________________________________ P2PSIP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
