On Jul 17, 2008, at 12:23 PM, Enrico Marocco wrote:
David A. Bryan wrote:
We should to be continue to very clear that ICE is the mechanism we
use in deployments where there is any chance there will be a NAT. I
just think we should try to keep in mind that, perhaps more than
other
WGs, we have some folks who want to do unusual things, and some of
them justifiable don't need ICE.
I would like to second this. There are also folks who look forward to
adopting the protocol specified here in research projects focused on
overlays and distributed algorithms in general. P2PSIP would benefit
much from such adoption
+1
_______________________________________________
P2PSIP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
