Hi all,

  In the last meeting there was a discussion on direct routing and the 
conclusions were (if I recall correctly) that this should not be something that 
complicates the  protocol and that we could have support for indicating the use 
of direct routing if the deployment is amenable to such a scenario.

 I would like to propose we add a flag bit in the forwarding/common header that 
indicates that a direct routing response to a message be used by the responding 
node. As a policy, implementations in certain scenarios would enable the flag 
as necessary.

We can indicate that the responding node need not keep state to minimize 
complications. The sending node can simply resend a request (e.g STORE) with 
the flag turned off if does not receive a response to the initial STORE request 
with the flag turned on.

This allows direct routing support in scenarios where the deployer or the 
implementation knows it is dealing with reachable IP addresses. This is also 
possible without any complications to the base protocol.

Best
Saumitra
_______________________________________________
P2PSIP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip

Reply via email to