At Sat, 11 Jul 2009 23:10:07 -0700, Narayanan, Vidya wrote: > > I'd support this as well. I think this would be quite useful. > > Vidya > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Hardie, Ted > > Sent: Friday, July 10, 2009 4:25 PM > > To: Bruce Lowekamp > > Cc: Eric Rescorla; Narayanan, Vidya; [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [P2PSIP] Client operation in RELOAD > > > > At 4:10 PM -0700 7/10/09, Bruce Lowekamp wrote: > > >ekr already mentioned that AppAttach is supposed to come into the next > > draft. > > > > > >What if we have a 16 bit field in Attach and AttachLite that specifies > > >role/purpose of the connection? No normative purpose in the base > > >draft, but for use with future extensions. Specify maybe five values > > >for neighbor, routing table, peer optimization, client responsible > > >peer attachment, and client optimization, and allow for future code > > >points. > > > > In general, this sounds like a useful way forward.
I don't see that this change adds any value. It's just additional cruft. -Ekr _______________________________________________ P2PSIP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
