On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 11:45 PM, Song Haibin<[email protected]> wrote: > Bruce, > > I followed this thread and generally I like this option. It would be > explicitly useful to identify client and peer operations. I'm a little > confused why we should depend on the Update message to determine whether an > attached node is a client or a peer.
This is a category error: we don't depend on the Update message to determine whether an attached node is a client or peer because client isn't an important concept in RELOAD. Rather, the rules cause peers to treat adjacencies correctly whether they are peers, clients, or peers who haven't completed the join process yet. There is no need for a peer to detect or remember whether an adjacency is a client or peer. -Ekr _______________________________________________ P2PSIP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
