I believe this is correct. The higher turn-density the more candidate resource-id names there are, which means that the likelihood of there being a server at each resource-id (holding the actual number of servers constant) decreases. Thus, if turn-density (which, remember, is your estimate) is too high, then you have to probe a lot of resource-ids
-Ekr 2010/11/2 <[email protected]> > > The text is as follow in the draft: > If turn-density is too high, then the process of finding TURN servers > becomes extremely expensive as multiple candidate Resource-IDs must be > probed. > > But I think this sentence is incorrect, and it should be "If turn-density > is too low". Do you think so? > > Peng YongLin > > ************************************************* > 邮 件：[email protected] > 内 线：88190 > 外 线：025-52878190 > 手 机：13776637274 > ************************************************* > > -------------------------------------------------------- > ZTE Information Security Notice: The information contained in this mail is > solely property of the sender's organization. This mail communication is > confidential. Recipients named above are obligated to maintain secrecy and > are not permitted to disclose the contents of this communication to others. > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended > solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If > you have received this email in error please notify the originator of the > message. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual > sender. > This message has been scanned for viruses and Spam by ZTE Anti-Spam system. > > > _______________________________________________ > P2PSIP mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip > >
_______________________________________________ P2PSIP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
