Good catch. I have fixed this and tried to clarify the text a little to make it 
clearer. 

On Nov 2, 2010, at 11:33 PM, [email protected] wrote:

> 
> The text is as follow in the draft: 
> If turn-density is too high, then the process of finding TURN servers becomes 
> extremely expensive as multiple candidate Resource-IDs must be probed. 
> 
> But I think this sentence is incorrect, and it should be "If turn-density is 
> too low". Do you think so?
> 
> Peng YongLin 
> 
> *************************************************
> 邮 件:[email protected]
> 内 线:88190
> 外 线:025-52878190
> 手 机:13776637274
> ************************************************* 
> --------------------------------------------------------
> ZTE Information Security Notice: The information contained in this mail is 
> solely property of the sender's organization. This mail communication is 
> confidential. Recipients named above are obligated to maintain secrecy and 
> are not permitted to disclose the contents of this communication to others.
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended 
> solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If 
> you have received this email in error please notify the originator of the 
> message. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual 
> sender.
> This message has been scanned for viruses and Spam by ZTE Anti-Spam system.
> 

_______________________________________________
P2PSIP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip

Reply via email to