Robin Berjon wrote:

> On Thursday 25 October 2001 18:09, Rafiq Ismail wrote:
> > On Thu, 25 Oct 2001, Nathan Torkington wrote:
> > > I can have p5ee.perl.org created, and set up people to edit the
> > > content, but I want to see some progress before p5ee gets 'blessed'
> > > like that.  Similarly, I'll make a CVS repository when we have code
> > > to version :-)
> >
> > Like wise, code shouldn't be written until it has been clearly spec'd.
> > Like wise, spec's shouldn't be written until we know our requirements.
> > Like wise, requirements's won't be known until we understand the language
> > and nature of the model we're modling.
>
> I think we can try to be more iterative than that. I wouldn't mind writing
> some code (with the obvious caveat that it has strong chances of not being
> final at all) in order to flatten out the rough edges of the specs and to
> isolate clear requirements. Spec'ing without some reference implementation
> and a clear idea of what is a good/bad idea in actual code imho often leads
> to problems (and I'm not even into XP ;-).
>

I was thinking about this my self - As a programmer I feel it a lot nicer
to talk with examples - a picture tells a thousand words, so a bit of perl
must count for a few....

and I got around to playing with a few ideas that have been bounced around
on the group namely about a foundation library - I spent a couple of hours on
it
last night using some techniques I've kinda used + seen used in the MVC
thing before..

I've put a file up at :

http://217.33.8.110/foundation.txt

( If anyone thinks it usefull and can pop it on there own server then
that would be very nice - it's only a wee test beastie and not suited
to traffic.)

Steve.

>
> --
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Robin Berjon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- CTO
> k n o w s c a p e : // venture knowledge agency www.knowscape.com
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Heisenberg may have been here.
>
> _____________________________________________________________________
> This message has been checked for all known viruses by the
> MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service.

Reply via email to