On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 23:33, Subhendu Ghosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > David Teigland wrote: >> >> On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 10:11:00PM +0100, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >>> >>> I'd have thought fence.git and fence-agents.git in one and cman.git >>> and rgmanager.git in another. >>> But I may be missing some of the interdependencies. >> >> I wouldn't mind either of those combinations. Maybe rgmanager's last >> stand will be in cluster.git anyway... if so, then it's not a factor. >> >> I didn't have much reason for separating fence/fence-agents. We're >> planning on unifying it all anyway, even if the agents are done sooner. >> And I don't think packaging/releasing agents separately should have much >> bearing on the source tree? (I've heard interest in putting agents in >> their own package for Fedora.) >> >> Dave >> >> > > Cobbler is also starting to use the fence agents in a totally non-cluster > related way. So some separate of fence/fenced from fence agents - at least > on the packaging end - would be really useful
Right, I think this can/should be handled at the packaging level _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list Pacemaker@clusterlabs.org http://list.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
