On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 11:02, Fabio M. Di Nitto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 09:52 +0100, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 06:52, Fabio M. Di Nitto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > There is actually an important difference for me to keep them separated. >> > >> > Each time we do a package update, the whole set of daemons will need to >> > go through testing again, even if they didn't change a bit. >> >> True. >> >> Random thought - how about having the resource and fence agents together? >> Similar things with similar update frequencies... > > hmmm no.. same reason. they have different tasks.. different subsystems > etc. They're still scripts though (and there's not much more difference between an IP and IPMI script than there is between an IP and Apache script). And I'd guess that the chances of each set needing a refresh is about the same at any given point in time... _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list Pacemaker@clusterlabs.org http://list.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
