Never mind, ignore all that. I see the problem. What I dont understand is why no-one else has been seeing this.
Anyway, it really is a logging issue that you can safely ignore. On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Andrew Beekhof <and...@beekhof.net> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 10:35 PM, Pavel Georgiev <ne...@neron.org> wrote: >> I get an awful lot of ' Action * took *s to complete' error since switching >> from 1.0.2 to 1.0.3: > > [snip] > >> I`m running the prebuild rpms for centos5 (5.2 in my case). > > What hardware? > > I was expecting an ntpd clock jump, or a return of -1 from time(), but > this is really strange... > > May 1 05:52:08 ltsilver10-srv2 crmd: [24825]: info: main: CRM Hg > Version: b133b3f19797c00f9189f4b66b513963f9d25db9 > May 1 05:52:08 ltsilver10-srv2 crmd: [24825]: info: crmd_init: Starting crmd > May 1 05:52:08 ltsilver10-srv2 crmd: [24825]: ERROR: do_fsa_action: > Action A_LOG took 1236042029s to complete > > Starting from the UNIX epoch, the command would have to have been > running until "Tue Mar 3 02:00:29 CET 2009" for the error to be true. > Either that or the second call to times() returned "Sun Mar 1 > 03:51:39 CET 1970", which is also highly unlikely. > > So its clearly wrong, but I can't figure out why. > All I can think of is an endian issue (hence the question about what > hardware you're running). > _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
