When can we expect a fix for this?
On May 4, 2009, at 10:17 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
Never mind, ignore all that. I see the problem.
What I dont understand is why no-one else has been seeing this.
Anyway, it really is a logging issue that you can safely ignore.
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Andrew Beekhof <and...@beekhof.net>
wrote:
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 10:35 PM, Pavel Georgiev <ne...@neron.org>
wrote:
I get an awful lot of ' Action * took *s to complete' error since
switching
from 1.0.2 to 1.0.3:
[snip]
I`m running the prebuild rpms for centos5 (5.2 in my case).
What hardware?
I was expecting an ntpd clock jump, or a return of -1 from time(),
but
this is really strange...
May 1 05:52:08 ltsilver10-srv2 crmd: [24825]: info: main: CRM Hg
Version: b133b3f19797c00f9189f4b66b513963f9d25db9
May 1 05:52:08 ltsilver10-srv2 crmd: [24825]: info: crmd_init:
Starting crmd
May 1 05:52:08 ltsilver10-srv2 crmd: [24825]: ERROR: do_fsa_action:
Action A_LOG took 1236042029s to complete
Starting from the UNIX epoch, the command would have to have been
running until "Tue Mar 3 02:00:29 CET 2009" for the error to be
true.
Either that or the second call to times() returned "Sun Mar 1
03:51:39 CET 1970", which is also highly unlikely.
So its clearly wrong, but I can't figure out why.
All I can think of is an endian issue (hence the question about what
hardware you're running).
_______________________________________________
Pacemaker mailing list
Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
_______________________________________________
Pacemaker mailing list
Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
