On 8 October 2010 08:29, Andrew Beekhof <and...@beekhof.net> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 9:58 PM, Pavlos Parissis
> <pavlos.paris...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 7 October 2010 09:01, Andrew Beekhof <and...@beekhof.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 6:31 PM, Pavlos Parissis
>>> <pavlos.paris...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > Hi,
>>> >
>>> > I am having again the same issue, in a different set of 3 nodes. When I
>>> > try
>>> > to failover manually the resource group on the standby node, the ms-drbd
>>> > resource is not moved as well and as a result the resource group is not
>>> > fully started, only the ip resource is started.
>>> > Any ideas why I am having this issue?
>>>
>>> I think its a bug that was fixed recently.  Could you try the latest
>>> from code Mercurial?
>>
>> 1.1 or 1.2 branch?
>
> 1.1
>
to save time on compiling stuff I want to use the available rpms on
1.1.3 version from rpm-next repo.
But before I go and recreate the scenario, which means rebuild 3
nodes, I would like to know if this bug is fixed in 1.1.3

Thanks,
Pavlos

_______________________________________________
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker

Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker

Reply via email to