On 8 October 2010 09:29, Andrew Beekhof <and...@beekhof.net> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Pavlos Parissis > <pavlos.paris...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 8 October 2010 08:29, Andrew Beekhof <and...@beekhof.net> wrote: >>> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 9:58 PM, Pavlos Parissis >>> <pavlos.paris...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 7 October 2010 09:01, Andrew Beekhof <and...@beekhof.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 6:31 PM, Pavlos Parissis >>>>> <pavlos.paris...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> > Hi, >>>>> > >>>>> > I am having again the same issue, in a different set of 3 nodes. When I >>>>> > try >>>>> > to failover manually the resource group on the standby node, the ms-drbd >>>>> > resource is not moved as well and as a result the resource group is not >>>>> > fully started, only the ip resource is started. >>>>> > Any ideas why I am having this issue? >>>>> >>>>> I think its a bug that was fixed recently. Could you try the latest >>>>> from code Mercurial? >>>> >>>> 1.1 or 1.2 branch? >>> >>> 1.1 >>> >> to save time on compiling stuff I want to use the available rpms on >> 1.1.3 version from rpm-next repo. >> But before I go and recreate the scenario, which means rebuild 3 >> nodes, I would like to know if this bug is fixed in 1.1.3 > > As I said, I believe so.
I recreated the 3 node cluster and I didn't face that issue, but I am going to keep an eye on it for few days and even rerun the whole scenario (recreate 3 node cluster ...) just to be very sure. If I don't the see it again I will also close the bug report Thanks, Pavlos _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
