Lars Marowsky-Bree @ 18/3/2011 6:44 -0300 dixit:
Also this design conflicts with idea of "quorum node", which is not
supposed to run resources. Quorum node, by it's existence only, may
cause resource failure!
Quorum nodes - i.e., a full pacemaker node - are a broken idea, and work
around a deficiency in the cluster stack's quorum handling.
Why is that it is a broken idea ?
In the case of partition, reason might be a network failure.
A quorum node could behave as a reference point to determine which part
of the cluster is still connected to the rest of the world ?
--
Carlos G Mendioroz <t...@huapi.ba.ar> LW7 EQI Argentina
_______________________________________________
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
