On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Carlos G Mendioroz <t...@huapi.ba.ar> wrote: > > Serge Dubrouski @ 21/03/2011 13:10 -0300 dixit: >>> >>> What I am talking about is monitoring (probing) of a resource on a node >>> where this resource cannot be exist. > >> As far as I understand that would require a definition of a "quorum" >> node or another special kind of node where resource cannot exist. >> Figuring out a a such role from location/collocation rules seems to >> complex to me. The idea of quorum node was abandoned by long ago in >> favor for some other features/project that Lars mentioned earlier. > > There is already a location rule, and a minus infinite value. > > Is that value being used dynamically ? If not, that could be used > as a marker for "this (resource) can not possibly run in this node" > so monitoring is not necesary ?
It is used dynamically quite often. For example moving resource out of one node creates a such location rule. Does it mean that along with moving resource Pacemaker has to stop monitoring it on the left node? I don't think so. > > -- > Carlos G Mendioroz <t...@huapi.ba.ar> LW7 EQI Argentina > > _______________________________________________ > Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker > > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf > Bugs: > http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker > -- Serge Dubrouski. _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker