On 16.02.2012 05:23, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: > Newer versions of pacemaker and lrmd are able to deal with upstart > resources via dbus. > However I do not like this way, so please find resource-agent attached, > which is able to manage arbitrary upstart job (just like Anything but > for upstart resources). It already saved me much time and nerves > managing libvirtd (with my own upstart job) which you probably already > know always wants to SIGABRT (btw I even know the main reason for that > and now testing patch which I will hopefully send to libvirt ml).
But, you use 'initctl' in your OCF which also relies on dbus (libdbus, to be correct; in both cases running dbus is not a requirement). Reason why we didn't use initctl, grep, awk and company, when we developed the upstart RAexec, was cause doing it that way was slower. And ugly :) I guess I'm just interested what do you find wrong or bad with how current upstart RAexec is done? Thanks _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
